The ultimate treaty vs rush thread

User avatar
No Flag fightinfrenchman
Ninja
Donator 04
Posts: 23505
Joined: Oct 17, 2015
Location: Pennsylvania

The ultimate treaty vs rush thread

Post by fightinfrenchman »

Once and for all, the members of this forum must debate and decide which game mode is superior: rush or treaty... i will be the moderator of this debate

no yelling
Dromedary Scone Mix is not Alone Mix
Image
United States of America sc
Dragoon
Posts: 323
Joined: Jun 7, 2015
ESO: _ZOMBIE_
Location: MN, USA

The ultimate treaty vs rush thread

Post by sc »

shut the fuck up lol
VIRTZN and CM1993 are my friends and they never cheat. everyone should add them. kappa
User avatar
United States of America _H2O
ESOC Business Team
Donator 06
Posts: 3409
Joined: Aug 20, 2016
ESO: _H2O

The ultimate treaty vs rush thread

Post by _H2O »

there is already a thread about this actually lol. This forum is largely a sup forum. Glad to see a lot of treaty players joining the site with the launch of the treaty tournament.
United States of America evilcheadar
Gendarme
Posts: 5786
Joined: Aug 20, 2015
Location: USA

The ultimate treaty vs rush thread

Post by evilcheadar »

Treaty is superior, remember that I deduced that treaty players have higher iq scores (on average). A prime example is a rush player like MrBramboy and a treaty player like metis. Which one would you like to do your needed brain surgery?
A post not made is a post given away

A slushie a day keeps the refill thread at bay

Jackson Pollock was the best poster to ever to post on these forums
User avatar
No Flag fightinfrenchman
Ninja
Donator 04
Posts: 23505
Joined: Oct 17, 2015
Location: Pennsylvania

The ultimate treaty vs rush thread

Post by fightinfrenchman »

h2o wrote:there is already a thread about this actually lol. This forum is largely a sup forum. Glad to see a lot of treaty players joining the site with the launch of the treaty tournament.
i didn''t see that thread... i think with the influx of new players we can try this discussion again
Dromedary Scone Mix is not Alone Mix
Image
User avatar
No Flag fightinfrenchman
Ninja
Donator 04
Posts: 23505
Joined: Oct 17, 2015
Location: Pennsylvania

The ultimate treaty vs rush thread

Post by fightinfrenchman »

sc wrote:shut the fuck up lol
please refrain from bad language
Dromedary Scone Mix is not Alone Mix
Image
User avatar
United States of America gustavusadolphus
Lancer
Posts: 520
Joined: Oct 19, 2015

The ultimate treaty vs rush thread

Post by gustavusadolphus »

This may not belong here but ............................................ what do you guys think about deathmatch?
10000 gallon fiberglass, FNS plus DE filter 48 square foot, ray pack Mini Max 512 BTU gas heater, one Sip n Oodle, NO ZEOSAND
User avatar
No Flag fightinfrenchman
Ninja
Donator 04
Posts: 23505
Joined: Oct 17, 2015
Location: Pennsylvania

The ultimate treaty vs rush thread

Post by fightinfrenchman »

gustavusadolphus wrote:gays should be stoned to death
offensive statement, please refrain from this
Dromedary Scone Mix is not Alone Mix
Image
United States of America evilcheadar
Gendarme
Posts: 5786
Joined: Aug 20, 2015
Location: USA

The ultimate treaty vs rush thread

Post by evilcheadar »

gustavusadolphus wrote:This may not belong here but ............................................ what do you guys think about deathmatch?
lol
A post not made is a post given away

A slushie a day keeps the refill thread at bay

Jackson Pollock was the best poster to ever to post on these forums
User avatar
United States of America gustavusadolphus
Lancer
Posts: 520
Joined: Oct 19, 2015

The ultimate treaty vs rush thread

Post by gustavusadolphus »

I did not say that no need to be so toxic
10000 gallon fiberglass, FNS plus DE filter 48 square foot, ray pack Mini Max 512 BTU gas heater, one Sip n Oodle, NO ZEOSAND
United States of America evilcheadar
Gendarme
Posts: 5786
Joined: Aug 20, 2015
Location: USA

The ultimate treaty vs rush thread

Post by evilcheadar »

gustavusadolphus wrote:I did not say that no need to be so toxic
shut up
A post not made is a post given away

A slushie a day keeps the refill thread at bay

Jackson Pollock was the best poster to ever to post on these forums
User avatar
No Flag fightinfrenchman
Ninja
Donator 04
Posts: 23505
Joined: Oct 17, 2015
Location: Pennsylvania

The ultimate treaty vs rush thread

Post by fightinfrenchman »

gustavusadolphus wrote:I am toxic
i know, there is no dbeate about that
Dromedary Scone Mix is not Alone Mix
Image
User avatar
No Flag howlingwolfpaw
Jaeger
Posts: 3476
Joined: Oct 4, 2015

The ultimate treaty vs rush thread

Post by howlingwolfpaw »

I have only played a few death matches.... but how about a death match treaty..... it would speed things up a bit so you could have treaty like economy at 20 mins instead of 40.... basically immediately age but use villies to make buildings, then spam out from your tc your villagers and start your boom like normal. (brits/ japan would be OP for this)

As for myself I prefer treaty or FFA. and KOTH FFA All fun games, I'm not super competitive for SUP. I actually like the economy of the game.
User avatar
United States of America _H2O
ESOC Business Team
Donator 06
Posts: 3409
Joined: Aug 20, 2016
ESO: _H2O

The ultimate treaty vs rush thread

Post by _H2O »

it was like a few weeks ago
User avatar
Great Britain samwise12
Pro Player
Summer 2015 winner
Posts: 777
Joined: Apr 19, 2015
ESO: Samwise12
Location: United Kingdom

The ultimate treaty vs rush thread

Post by samwise12 »

sup>deathmatch>treaty in terms of skill required
No Flag anonymousv2
Musketeer
Posts: 53
Joined: Jul 11, 2015

The ultimate treaty vs rush thread

Post by anonymousv2 »

People who play 40 min treaty, are essentially just noob scrubs playing death match against the AI, except that they are playing multiplayer. The amount of skill needed in a treaty game is much less than a rush/supremacy game. That is fact. In treaty you only have to focus on two things, building units and build walls. In Supremacy, you need dozens of things at the same time. You need to make villd, herd hunts, manage vills, building units, map control, microing like a beast, etc.... Treaty itself is not inherently for scrubs, 10-20 minute treaty games are okay but they still allow some sitting back and relaxing.
User avatar
France [Armag] diarouga
Ninja
NWC LAN Gold
Posts: 12710
Joined: Feb 26, 2015
ESO: diarouga
Location: France

The ultimate treaty vs rush thread

Post by [Armag] diarouga »

samwise12 wrote:sup>'deathmatch>'treaty in terms of skill required
+1
No Flag v1pus
Skirmisher
Posts: 168
Joined: Jun 13, 2015

The ultimate treaty vs rush thread

Post by v1pus »

Pointless debate
User avatar
No Flag imperial
Musketeer
Posts: 57
Joined: Mar 29, 2015

The ultimate treaty vs rush thread

Post by imperial »

Supremacy wants more skills lol Treaty just sucks hard!!! age3 without treaty is just better!
User avatar
No Flag fightinfrenchman
Ninja
Donator 04
Posts: 23505
Joined: Oct 17, 2015
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: The ultimate treaty vs rush thread

  • Quote

Post by fightinfrenchman »

_H2O wrote:there is already a thread about this actually lol. This forum is largely a sup forum. Glad to see a lot of treaty players joining the site with the launch of the treaty tournament.
get out of here with that bullshite ngl
Dromedary Scone Mix is not Alone Mix
Image
User avatar
United States of America n0el
ESOC Business Team
Posts: 7068
Joined: Jul 24, 2015
ESO: jezabob
Clan: 팀 하우스

Re: The ultimate treaty vs rush thread

  • Quote

Post by n0el »

fightinfrenchman wrote:
_H2O wrote:there is already a thread about this actually lol. This forum is largely a sup forum. Glad to see a lot of treaty players joining the site with the launch of the treaty tournament.
get out of here with that bullshite ngl
what a way to make a 20000th post
mad cuz bad
No Flag deleted_user
Ninja
Posts: 14364
Joined: Mar 26, 2015

Re: The ultimate treaty vs rush thread

  • Quote

Post by deleted_user »

worst 20,000th post
User avatar
France ǝɯɐuɹǝsn
Dragoon
Posts: 249
Joined: Jul 9, 2020

Re: The ultimate treaty vs rush thread

Post by ǝɯɐuɹǝsn »

howlingwolfpaw wrote:I have only played a few death matches.... but how about a death match treaty..... it would speed things up a bit so you could have treaty like economy at 20 mins instead of 40.... basically immediately age but use villies to make buildings, then spam out from your tc your villagers and start your boom like normal. (brits/ japan would be OP for this)

As for myself I prefer treaty or FFA. and KOTH FFA All fun games, I'm not super competitive for SUP. I actually like the economy of the game.
treaty 20 mins without deadmatch ressource are already enought to got eco, if you're not noob 20mn is enought to go max vills, age 5 + eco up + wall


to answer to the subject so you basically ask wich one are better between guys who can micro and macro at the same time, and guy who just sit and macro for 40mn, and after, just micro for 40 other minute, that the easiest question ever lol
User avatar
Netherlands Mr_Bramboy
Retired Contributor
Donator 01
Posts: 8219
Joined: Feb 26, 2015
ESO: [VOC] Bram
Location: Amsterdam

Re: The ultimate treaty vs rush thread

  • Quote

Post by Mr_Bramboy »

evilcheadar wrote:Treaty is superior, remember that I deduced that treaty players have higher iq scores (on average). A prime example is a rush player like MrBramboy and a treaty player like metis. Which one would you like to do your needed brain surgery?
I've had a rivalry with the basement for more than 5 years. It's kind of beautiful.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests

Which top 10 players do you wish to see listed?

All-time

Active last two weeks

Active last month

Supremacy

Treaty

Official

ESOC Patch

Treaty Patch

1v1 Elo

2v2 Elo

3v3 Elo

Power Rating

Which streams do you wish to see listed?

Twitch

Age of Empires III

Age of Empires IV