Hi guys
Posted: 18 Apr 2015, 23:51
So after all these years I installed TAD again. Let's see if I haven't forgotten how to play.
<'3
<'3
The most active Age of Empires III community: hosting seasonal tournaments, live streams, replays, expert strategy, and fan-made content.
https://eso-community.net/
hopexiphos wrote:So after all these years I installed TAD again. Let''s see if I haven''t forgotten how to play.
<3
+1mitoe wrote:Welcome back to AoE3 and the new forum! ^ ^
+2divinefire wrote:+1mitoe wrote:Welcome back to AoE3 and the new forum! ^ ^
+3frycookofdoom wrote:+2divinefire wrote:+1
Nice! Welcome backhopexiphos wrote:So after all these years I installed TAD again. Let''s see if I haven''t forgotten how to play.
<'3
Haha I have so many good memories of that time.incog wrote:I remember Xiphos especially for the "proudly not a pixel-pointer sig" as well as his views on ego-posting for aoe3 replays, in that ego-posting doesn''t really exist. if you''re a man, you don''t care if one of your losses is posted.
manly, manly
xiphos is an ancient greek sword iirc. leaf blade. think of sting from lotr
ah nothing like some good news after a good sunday lunch with alcohol ^^
Is Deccan part of the troll or?aizamk wrote:All sorts of people logging back into ESO
[img]http://imgur.com/KhplP3p[/img]
Why would so many people play such an unbalanced game.aizamk wrote:All sorts of people logging back into ESO
[img style="max-width:100%'" alt="" src="http://imgur.com/KhplP3p"]
Because its still fun.frycookofdoom wrote:Why would so many people play such an unbalanced game.aizamk wrote:All sorts of people logging back into ESO
[img]http://imgur.com/KhplP3p" alt="[/img]
"Unbalanced" doesnt mean "not playable". The fact that AoE3 is just a nice game, makes people still playing it!ivan wrote:Because its still fun.frycookofdoom wrote:Why would so many people play such an unbalanced game.
How can it be fun if its unfair and unsuited to competitive play?ivan wrote:Because its still fun.frycookofdoom wrote:Why would so many people play such an unbalanced game.
I just have trouble imagining how anyone could enjoy playing a game where your ability to win is determined by which civ you play.garja wrote:Competitive play is not the issue with balance. It is more about civ variety. Still the game is fun.
Iro? I played alot of Japan, India, French, Dutch and Aztecs but not Iro :p. But thx:) Are you SoldieR? Then I remember you. You still play?iamsoldier wrote:Ahh I remember you were iro lamer xD hah. But ya I think you were mainly iro back in the day? Welcome back!
To be honest if youre not like pr40 or so it is probably better to avoid any balance discussion all together. No offense eh, Im just saying in general.frycookofdoom wrote:I just have trouble imagining how anyone could enjoy playing a game where your ability to win is determined by which civ you play.garja wrote:Competitive play is not the issue with balance. It is more about civ variety. Still the game is fun.
Pretty much everyone lamed the top civs back in the dayiamsoldier wrote:Ahh I remember you were iro lamer xD hah. But ya I think you were mainly iro back in the day? Welcome back!