DracoWolfgand wrote:French Cuirassiers are awesome, however, I was originally not including then on my analysis beause, truth be told, I was wanting it to be more of a analysis between the Sioux and the Indians, as I... Well, I SEEN then, as being both similar in that they are both cavalry-based civilizations with no true artillery units( Siege Elephants and Flail Elephants dont fully count as "true" artillery on my eyes, but as artllery/cavalry hybrids, even if the game treats then as artillery ). Although apparently people here arent actually too big on Indian cavalry :p -Sigh-The truth is, I actually started plaiyng this game just a few months ago and havent got into the competitive scene yet. A part of me is feeling tempted to delete this topic and just remake a new one later when I have more experience.
Don't feel bad I'm only a master sergeant and still learning lots about competitive play but you learn by asking questions. india in particular is a complex civ so it's probably the hardest to learn and play well
@
Garja i would agree that Russia is a cav civ. 3 cards for cossacks and oprichniks (4 if you count advanced arsenal for opris) and 2 for cav archers (a little underwhelming in age 3 but scale very well). Cossacks taking 1 pop is such an underrated feature.
Sioux cav is very very good but i do find axe riders a bit paper thin sometimes.
Also aztec has great "cav" coyotes and eagle runners, but i cant bring myself to call it a cav civ