EP Old Han Reform Not Viable?

User avatar
United States of America occamslightsaber
Retired Contributor
Posts: 1326
Joined: May 31, 2019
ESO: L1BERTYPR1ME

EP Old Han Reform Not Viable?

Post by occamslightsaber »

Hi all, I'm fairly new to this community and the ESOC Patch and I couldn't find much discussion about why the Old Han Reform card is not used as often. It seems many top China players like Mitoe don't even have the card in their decks. Even after the nerf, the Old Han Army with Reform still appears to me as a more cost and population effective alternative to the Territorial Army in the late game.

The only real issue I see with the Old Han Reform card is that enemy skirmishers outrange Chu Ko Nus and thus can kite them, but I think this can be remedied by maintaining a small force of arquebusiers or snaring them with cavalry. Can veteran players give me some input on this? Thanks.
The scientific term for China creating free units is Mitoe-sis.

I intend all my puns.
User avatar
Italy Garja
Retired Contributor
Donator 02
Posts: 9730
Joined: Feb 11, 2015
ESO: Garja

Re: EP Old Han Reform Not Viable?

  • Quote

Post by Garja »

Overreaction to a nerf. Card is still good but now it's more of an option rather than a must.
Image Image Image
User avatar
Tuvalu gibson
Ninja
ECL Reigning Champs
Posts: 13598
Joined: May 4, 2015
Location: USA

Re: EP Old Han Reform Not Viable?

Post by gibson »

Yea it used to be that one of the win conditions for China was getting old Han. Like if you look at games where China got old Han they won probably 85% of games at least, and since it's not op like that anymore skirm sword is just easier.
User avatar
United States of America occamslightsaber
Retired Contributor
Posts: 1326
Joined: May 31, 2019
ESO: L1BERTYPR1ME

Re: EP Old Han Reform Not Viable?

Post by occamslightsaber »

So are there any other reasons to prefer the Territorial Army over the Old Han Army other than the range and the fact that just skirm/swords are easier to macro/micro?

I've been thinking that switching to the Old Han Army after coin mines run out and pushing while the opponent is busy building plantations would be really effective, especially since coin from rice paddies (0.34 base rate) gather slower than wood. I'd try it myself but I've never actually gotten so far into a game with the Chinese to send the Old Han Reform card in 1v1.
The scientific term for China creating free units is Mitoe-sis.

I intend all my puns.
User avatar
Italy Garja
Retired Contributor
Donator 02
Posts: 9730
Joined: Feb 11, 2015
ESO: Garja

Re: EP Old Han Reform Not Viable?

Post by Garja »

Food/gold macro is usually better. They need one less up and you economize on up cards.
Image Image Image
User avatar
Germany Lukas_L99
Pro Player
Donator 01
Posts: 2059
Joined: Nov 15, 2015
ESO: Lukas_L99
Location: Lübeck

Re: EP Old Han Reform Not Viable?

Post by Lukas_L99 »

It's not really cause its easier, it's cause it's just faster. You don't need to wait until you researched 4 unit ups, rather just 2 for sword and skirms. Also it saves a shipment.
User avatar
Canada Mitoe
Advanced Theory Craftsman
Posts: 5488
Joined: Aug 23, 2015
ESO: Mitoe
GameRanger ID: 346407

Re: EP Old Han Reform Not Viable?

Post by Mitoe »

Territorial is usually better as others have mentioned, yeah. But it’s not bad, and it does preserve your mines which can be ok in certain situations. The main problem is that CKN are as good as Arqs but have less range, and range means everything later in the game.
No Flag deleted_user0
Ninja
Posts: 13004
Joined: Apr 28, 2020

Re: EP Old Han Reform Not Viable?

Post by deleted_user0 »

So ye, the card isnt really viable unless you had to go old han units earlier in the game (playing age2, or runnung out of res in age3 but cant sink res into paddies cuz the gamr is so scrappy). Its a very niche card now, almost not worth the slot.
User avatar
United States of America occamslightsaber
Retired Contributor
Posts: 1326
Joined: May 31, 2019
ESO: L1BERTYPR1ME

Re: EP Old Han Reform Not Viable?

Post by occamslightsaber »

@Mitoe Now that I think about it, I guess range really is a major drawback. After the nerf, using reformed CKNs over arquebusiers is a bit like using aennas/cetan bows over forest prowlers/wakina rifles. Better DPS, but not enough to compensate for their inferior range.

Thanks again everyone for contributing!
The scientific term for China creating free units is Mitoe-sis.

I intend all my puns.
User avatar
United States of America Squamiger
Howdah
Posts: 1757
Joined: Dec 25, 2018
ESO: Squamiger

Re: EP Old Han Reform Not Viable?

Post by Squamiger »

But old Han is still mandatory on RE right? I’ve always felt like it’s pretty clunky in 1v1 bc of how many upgrades it takes + shipments + not being macroed for cavalry. But I have used it to great effect in team games and ffa.
User avatar
Canada Mitoe
Advanced Theory Craftsman
Posts: 5488
Joined: Aug 23, 2015
ESO: Mitoe
GameRanger ID: 346407

Re: EP Old Han Reform Not Viable?

Post by Mitoe »

It's overpowered on RE to the extent that once it's arrived and you have a reasonable mass you almost can't lose.
User avatar
France [Armag] diarouga
Ninja
NWC LAN Gold
Posts: 12710
Joined: Feb 26, 2015
ESO: diarouga
Location: France

Re: EP Old Han Reform Not Viable?

Post by [Armag] diarouga »

It's not really viable on the EP. It's better to go for territorial army, which is a bit sad imo.
User avatar
Canada dansil92
Retired Contributor
Posts: 2232
Joined: Nov 3, 2018
ESO: dansil92

Re: EP Old Han Reform Not Viable?

Post by dansil92 »

Im not a huge fan of old han even on re, they are still short ranged units and cost just a stupid amount of wood, often a good size mass of lancers, artillery, etc. Will still make short work of them. Idk its never seemed super strong to me because the cost tradeoff and awkward to add in other units like cav. Maybe I'm not doing it right?
Image
User avatar
France [Armag] diarouga
Ninja
NWC LAN Gold
Posts: 12710
Joined: Feb 26, 2015
ESO: diarouga
Location: France

Re: EP Old Han Reform Not Viable?

Post by [Armag] diarouga »

The only weakness of Old Han is artillery but you have the crows to kill the artillery so it should be fine.
Other than that, the Old Han army counters everything but yumi mass (and it's actually close). Skirm/goon, skirm/cav, musk/huss etc get hard countered. Old Han probably even counters cuir mass.
Australia Hazza54321
Pro Player
Winter Champion 2020 x2Donator 01
Posts: 8050
Joined: May 4, 2015
ESO: PrinceofBabu

Re: EP Old Han Reform Not Viable?

Post by Hazza54321 »

Old han was fucking retarded on RE , you can literally 1v3 so easily as china pikes act as mini cav
User avatar
United States of America Squamiger
Howdah
Posts: 1757
Joined: Dec 25, 2018
ESO: Squamiger

Re: EP Old Han Reform Not Viable?

Post by Squamiger »

Sounds like I need to head to age4 more often in my 1st lieutenant RE China games

But maybe not, bc i feel like if I am safe enough to age to 4, upgrade ckn and pike twice, gather 1000f and send the card, and train old Han from scratch then I’ve probably already won the game in age 3. So should i put it in the deck or not ?
User avatar
Canada dansil92
Retired Contributor
Posts: 2232
Joined: Nov 3, 2018
ESO: dansil92

Re: EP Old Han Reform Not Viable?

Post by dansil92 »

You don't have to upgrade your pikes and ckn to make them good with old han. The 90 wood cost a pike is really prohibitive tho

I dont use old han, i just make forbidden and imperial army, occasionally some hand mortars and that seems to do good enough.

I just hate melee infantry so much i can't bring myself to use pikes. Maybe on a really low coin map its a solid strat but its really not my cup of tea. I have an old han FI deck i never use and i keep it in team game decks but i don't even have it in my tr40 deck
Image
User avatar
United States of America occamslightsaber
Retired Contributor
Posts: 1326
Joined: May 31, 2019
ESO: L1BERTYPR1ME

Re: EP Old Han Reform Not Viable?

Post by occamslightsaber »

@Squamiger Well, my line of thinking on RE has been that the Old Han Reform is really useful when coin mines run out for both sides in an evenly matched late game. While your opponent is busy throwing down plantations and upgrading them for 3000+ resources, you could age with the same amount of resources and get what are basically post-imperial units. But then again, it probably doesn't matter whether the Reform card is in the deck or not since such late games are incredibly rare in 1v1.

Also, given how villagers gather coins from rice paddies at a slower rate than wood (0.34 vs 0.5 base rate) in the late game, 270 wood for the Reformed Old Han Army isn't all that cost-prohibitive compared to the Territorial Army's 255 gold. But I think the main value of the card is that the cheap, archaic units you already created for 255 food and 180 wood suddenly become god-tier units after it is sent. Like diarouga wrote, the RE Old Han Army counters almost every composition. Because they are so tanky, you can even afford to chase kiting units to the end of the map.
The scientific term for China creating free units is Mitoe-sis.

I intend all my puns.
No Flag deleted_user0
Ninja
Posts: 13004
Joined: Apr 28, 2020

Re: EP Old Han Reform Not Viable?

Post by deleted_user0 »

[Armag] diarouga wrote:The only weakness of Old Han is artillery but you have the crows to kill the artillery so it should be fine.
Other than that, the Old Han army counters everything but yumi mass (and it's actually close). Skirm/goon, skirm/cav, musk/huss etc get hard countered. Old Han probably even counters cuir mass.


Urumi mahout wins too. If you can get enough urumi

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

Which top 10 players do you wish to see listed?

All-time

Active last two weeks

Active last month

Supremacy

Treaty

Official

ESOC Patch

Treaty Patch

1v1 Elo

2v2 Elo

3v3 Elo

Power Rating

Which streams do you wish to see listed?

Twitch

Age of Empires III

Age of Empires IV