Page 1 of 1

Diplomatic Intrigue vs Good Faith Agreements?

Posted: 13 Aug 2019, 16:20
by randerzbobanderz
Which is considered the better card in a typical 1v1 or team game where you need a colonial mass? As India I have been using GFA, but I see a lot of good players use Diplo. Intrigue.

Re: Diplomatic Intrigue vs Good Faith Agreements?

Posted: 13 Aug 2019, 16:21
by [Armag] diarouga
300e is better in supremacy.

Re: Diplomatic Intrigue vs Good Faith Agreements?

Posted: 13 Aug 2019, 16:23
by Sargsyan
gfa is good for faster age ups 300 export is better to get units out

Re: Diplomatic Intrigue vs Good Faith Agreements?

Posted: 13 Aug 2019, 16:32
by vividlyplain
GFA doesn't lower the cost of the consulate armies @randerzbobanderz so it doesn't really help with colonial mass. However, if you pair both cards you can then ship the 3 500 res crates from the French consulate which can be used to build infrastructure, age or mass. Probably not optimal but it can be used for certain builds/strats.

In most cases for regular supremacy 300e is insane value and the better of the two cards.

Re: Diplomatic Intrigue vs Good Faith Agreements?

Posted: 13 Aug 2019, 16:33
by [Armag] diarouga
Yea, it's 375 export in practice.

Re: Diplomatic Intrigue vs Good Faith Agreements?

Posted: 13 Aug 2019, 16:34
by Hazza54321
gfa build is nice on tp start but thats about it

Re: Diplomatic Intrigue vs Good Faith Agreements?

Posted: 13 Aug 2019, 17:03
by vividlyplain
diplo intrigue is also +75 every time you switch allies which is common practice with India iirc (otto start and switch to brits?)

Re: Diplomatic Intrigue vs Good Faith Agreements?

Posted: 13 Aug 2019, 17:29
by gamevideo113
Diplomatic intrigue is the better one of the two. At least it's usable alone. I never use GFA without diplomatic intrigue as well.