Is the porcelain tower really better than the academy?

User avatar
Netherlands Goodspeed
Retired Contributor
Posts: 13006
Joined: Feb 27, 2015

Re: Is the porcelain tower really better than the academy?

Post by Goodspeed »

gibson wrote:
Goodspeed wrote:For one, because 1000w is much more valuable than the skirm shipment? I'm not saying it's better but that was not a very good argument
The whole “you should ship x shipment because it’s worth more villager seconds” is a terrible argument.
It's not an argument, it's a reason why you might go for 1000w and academy over 10 skirm and tower, which you asked for.
User avatar
Italy Garja
Retired Contributor
Donator 02
Posts: 9730
Joined: Feb 11, 2015
ESO: Garja

Re: Is the porcelain tower really better than the academy?

Post by Garja »

trickle of wood > 1k wood all ot once. Also trickle of resources > crappy crow every once in a while. Also 10 skirms + trickle of wood > 8 skirms + 1k wood.
Image Image Image
User avatar
Tuvalu gibson
Ninja
ECL Reigning Champs
Posts: 13598
Joined: May 4, 2015
Location: USA

Re: Is the porcelain tower really better than the academy?

Post by gibson »

Goodspeed wrote:
gibson wrote:
Goodspeed wrote:For one, because 1000w is much more valuable than the skirm shipment? I'm not saying it's better but that was not a very good argument
The whole “you should ship x shipment because it’s worth more villager seconds” is a terrible argument.
It's not an argument, it's a reason why you might go for 1000w and academy over 10 skirm and tower, which you asked for.
That makes absolutely no sense. Youre aging with the wonder that short term is better while shipping a shipment that long term is better, when you can age with a wonder thats gonna give you more eco than youre eco shipment and ship a shipment that gives you more military value than the military you get from the wonder.
User avatar
Netherlands Goodspeed
Retired Contributor
Posts: 13006
Joined: Feb 27, 2015

Re: Is the porcelain tower really better than the academy?

Post by Goodspeed »

I think many of you are being so easily dismissive of the card mostly because it doesn't fit current China builds. (example: "only 400-600 of that wood is relevant in the next few minutes"). To make good use of it, you'd have to change your build.

That said, it's quite possibly not viable.
User avatar
Netherlands Goodspeed
Retired Contributor
Posts: 13006
Joined: Feb 27, 2015

Re: Is the porcelain tower really better than the academy?

Post by Goodspeed »

gibson wrote:
Goodspeed wrote:
Show hidden quotes
It's not an argument, it's a reason why you might go for 1000w and academy over 10 skirm and tower, which you asked for.
That makes absolutely no sense. Youre aging with the wonder that short term is better while shipping a shipment that long term is better, when you can age with a wonder thats gonna give you more eco than youre eco shipment and ship a shipment that gives you more military value than the military you get from the wonder.
You're disregarding the fact that the academy also has a long term effect. The tower doesn't give you more eco than 1000w + flying crows every X minutes combined.

One example of a situation where I can see this being viable is if you can't afford to ship 700w in transition because you need to ship units to defend raids or other colonial pressure from an opposing semi-FF. You would then easily use all of the 1k wood immediately.
User avatar
Italy Garja
Retired Contributor
Donator 02
Posts: 9730
Joined: Feb 11, 2015
ESO: Garja

Re: Is the porcelain tower really better than the academy?

Post by Garja »

The card is viable, as you can drop a 2nd rax and villages faster (+ market techs) and then use the porcelain tower on gold to get units out of two raxes.
But the point is the tower wonder is still better than the confucian wonder. Without the resource trickle having a 2nd rax is useless so is sending 1k wood (which is going to be a mere replacement of the wood trickle).
Image Image Image
User avatar
Netherlands Goodspeed
Retired Contributor
Posts: 13006
Joined: Feb 27, 2015

Re: Is the porcelain tower really better than the academy?

Post by Goodspeed »

Garja wrote:The card is viable, as you can drop a 2nd rax and villages faster (+ market techs) and then use the porcelain tower on gold to get units out of two raxes.
But the point is the tower wonder is still better than the confucian wonder. Without the resource trickle having a 2nd rax is useless so is sending 1k wood (which is going to be a mere replacement of the wood trickle).
Yeah, in games where you can afford tower and 1kw both it's obviously superior. But I think we're looking at situations where you can't afford to be quite that greedy.
User avatar
Italy Garja
Retired Contributor
Donator 02
Posts: 9730
Joined: Feb 11, 2015
ESO: Garja

Re: Is the porcelain tower really better than the academy?

Post by Garja »

In those games you go tower+unit shipment as it's superior to 8 skirms+1k wood.
Confucian is good in games when you are going to push out asap or in games where you desperately need those 8 skirms to survive. But those are not games where you send 1k wood. The only rare exception is when you held a rush with the skirm wonder but you lost buildings so 1k wood might be an option. Even then you have to consider whether still sending unit shipments and chopping for the buildings is better than waiting for 1k wood.
Image Image Image
User avatar
Tuvalu gibson
Ninja
ECL Reigning Champs
Posts: 13598
Joined: May 4, 2015
Location: USA

Re: Is the porcelain tower really better than the academy?

Post by gibson »

Yes thats really the point. Tower is better than skirm wonder in most situations, and if you have the tower youre better off either shipping units if youre gonna push or unit upgrades if you arent vs 1k wood. In fact youll see most china players dont even have 1k wood in deck. You either have iron troops or 1k wood and iron troops seem to be more useful.
User avatar
Germany Lukas_L99
Pro Player
Donator 01
Posts: 2059
Joined: Nov 15, 2015
ESO: Lukas_L99
Location: Lübeck

Re: Is the porcelain tower really better than the academy?

  • Quote

Post by Lukas_L99 »

Two reasons I don’t like 1k wood as china:
1. You don’t really have space for it in deck.
2. You usually send it when being greedy, in those situations I‘d rather send 1k coin and go age 4.
User avatar
France [Armag] diarouga
Ninja
NWC LAN Gold
Posts: 12710
Joined: Feb 26, 2015
ESO: diarouga
Location: France

Re: Is the porcelain tower really better than the academy?

Post by [Armag] diarouga »

Yea this too. If you have time to send 1000w just FI.
User avatar
Netherlands Goodspeed
Retired Contributor
Posts: 13006
Joined: Feb 27, 2015

Re: Is the porcelain tower really better than the academy?

Post by Goodspeed »

Academy + 1000w isn't all that greedy though is it? It's about as greedy as tower + unit shipments?
User avatar
United States of America Papist
Retired Contributor
Donator 03
Posts: 2602
Joined: Mar 29, 2015
ESO: Papist

Re: Is the porcelain tower really better than the academy?

Post by Papist »

dansil92 wrote:Tower just stops you getting housed. Producing constantly from tc and war academy without it is 'doable' but not wothout getting housed perpetually. If you really want the siege the flying crow offers (read: russia, ports, etc.) just send 7 hand mortars. Crows kinda suck age 3. Id almost be willing to bet hand mortars do more damage to infantry than a fortress crow
7 hand mortars have marginally better siege damage than a crow, but the damage to infantry is not comparable (35 for the mortars versus 237.5 for the crow). The crow also has better range resist and better splash (which makes it very useful against Russian paper units).
The function of man is to live, not to exist.
User avatar
United States of America Amsel_
Howdah
Posts: 1855
Joined: Jan 29, 2018
ESO: The_Amsel

Re: Is the porcelain tower really better than the academy?

Post by Amsel_ »

I usually go for the tower. In the long run, I think the boosted eco is more helpful than the crows. I don't feel like crows have a lot of oomph behind them, and it's fairly common for the opponent to just right click on it, and kill it quickly. And if your opponent can kill those 8 skirms as they spawn, it feels like a giant waste of time. The good thing about the skirms is that, against some opponents, you can combine them with your batch from the Summer Palace, and start walking to your enemy's base early on. So it might help if you want to do an aggressive FF; but personally I think the Porcelain Tower is better because you don't die by attrition as easily.
User avatar
Canada dansil92
Retired Contributor
Posts: 2232
Joined: Nov 3, 2018
ESO: dansil92

Re: Is the porcelain tower really better than the academy?

Post by dansil92 »

Papist wrote:
dansil92 wrote:Tower just stops you getting housed. Producing constantly from tc and war academy without it is 'doable' but not wothout getting housed perpetually. If you really want the siege the flying crow offers (read: russia, ports, etc.) just send 7 hand mortars. Crows kinda suck age 3. Id almost be willing to bet hand mortars do more damage to infantry than a fortress crow
7 hand mortars have marginally better siege damage than a crow, but the damage to infantry is not comparable (35 for the mortars versus 237.5 for the crow). The crow also has better range resist and better splash (which makes it very useful against Russian paper units).
I've literally never seen a crow accomplish anything in fortress vs units. They are so slow and just get right clicked every time. I know hand mortars are very weak vs infantry but it feels like crows are too
Image
User avatar
United States of America Papist
Retired Contributor
Donator 03
Posts: 2602
Joined: Mar 29, 2015
ESO: Papist

Re: Is the porcelain tower really better than the academy?

Post by Papist »

dansil92 wrote:
Papist wrote:
dansil92 wrote:Tower just stops you getting housed. Producing constantly from tc and war academy without it is 'doable' but not wothout getting housed perpetually. If you really want the siege the flying crow offers (read: russia, ports, etc.) just send 7 hand mortars. Crows kinda suck age 3. Id almost be willing to bet hand mortars do more damage to infantry than a fortress crow
7 hand mortars have marginally better siege damage than a crow, but the damage to infantry is not comparable (35 for the mortars versus 237.5 for the crow). The crow also has better range resist and better splash (which makes it very useful against Russian paper units).
I've literally never seen a crow accomplish anything in fortress vs units. They are so slow and just get right clicked every time. I know hand mortars are very weak vs infantry but it feels like crows are too
It's definitely not the greatest artillery unit in the game but it still deals a respectable amount of damage, especially when you're fighting in a choke. And even if it gets sniped down immediately, it isn't super important because 1) it's a free unit (this is what sets it apart from mortars the most I think) and 2) you've tanked one of your opponent's volleys. It also one shots falconets.

Given all of that, the only big problem I see with crows are their pop cost.
The function of man is to live, not to exist.
Sweden Zutazuta
Howdah
zuta
Posts: 1020
Joined: Apr 11, 2015

Re: Is the porcelain tower really better than the academy?

Post by Zutazuta »

Always take the skirms for a quick gg
User avatar
Germany Lukas_L99
Pro Player
Donator 01
Posts: 2059
Joined: Nov 15, 2015
ESO: Lukas_L99
Location: Lübeck

Re: Is the porcelain tower really better than the academy?

Post by Lukas_L99 »

Goodspeed wrote:Academy + 1000w isn't all that greedy though is it? It's about as greedy as tower + unit shipments?
Idk, the tower just pays off more than 1k wood long term so you only wanna use the academy when you need the skirms to hold->usually cant send 1k wood first.
User avatar
Italy Garja
Retired Contributor
Donator 02
Posts: 9730
Joined: Feb 11, 2015
ESO: Garja

Re: Is the porcelain tower really better than the academy?

  • Quote

Post by Garja »

On the subject, crows are awful. In a standard china vs semi FF I'd rather just delete the unit than having it take space for basically no use.
Image Image Image
User avatar
France [Armag] diarouga
Ninja
NWC LAN Gold
Posts: 12710
Joined: Feb 26, 2015
ESO: diarouga
Location: France

Re: Is the porcelain tower really better than the academy?

Post by [Armag] diarouga »

Garja wrote:On the subject, crows are awful. In a standard china vs semi FF I'd rather just delete the unit than having it take space for basically no use.
Rofl.
It's not that bad.
It gives you the range advantage (kills 1skirm/shot) and it is super tanky.
It's ofc not as good as a falc but still a nice unit to have, especially when you need to break BH/agra position.
User avatar
Italy Garja
Retired Contributor
Donator 02
Posts: 9730
Joined: Feb 11, 2015
ESO: Garja

Re: Is the porcelain tower really better than the academy?

Post by Garja »

India famous semi ff civ. My point is it's useless vs civs like french or ger. That thing takes forever to cross the map and the opponent just kites it and it will always fall behind. Also such a burden ir will cost units to protect it.
Image Image Image
User avatar
Canada Mitoe
Advanced Theory Craftsman
Posts: 5488
Joined: Aug 23, 2015
ESO: Mitoe
GameRanger ID: 346407

Re: Is the porcelain tower really better than the academy?

Post by Mitoe »

1000w is fine simply because it's a good way to be greedy that's safer than going Industrial. China has absolutely no issues spending all of the wood quickly. 2nd War Academy, completing remaining market techs, and securing more resources and LOS with villages is great even when you don't require the population space immediately. You will need it soon enough anyway.

Crows are fine. Can use them to slow siege and apply pressure at range, and if you keep the 1st one alive long enough to get a 2nd one (usually around 15:30 - 16 minutes) then you're in a really good spot.
User avatar
Finland princeofkabul
Pro Player
NWC LAN Top 8EPL Reigning Champs
Posts: 2372
Joined: Feb 28, 2015
ESO: Princeofkabul
Location: In retirement home with Sam and Vic

Re: Is the porcelain tower really better than the academy?

Post by princeofkabul »

honestly crows are fine if you get them to setup, people usually just don't care much about them and charge them into 20 hus occasionally. they're just hard to setup (animation is fucking weird) and slow as fuck.
Chairman of Washed Up clan
Leader of the Shady Swedes
Team Manager of the Blockhouse Boomers
User avatar
European Union aaryngend
Howdah
Posts: 1563
Joined: Sep 26, 2015
Location: Germany
Clan: N3O

Re: Is the porcelain tower really better than the academy?

Post by aaryngend »

princeofkabul wrote:honestly crows are fine if you get them to setup, people usually just don't care much about them and charge them into 20 hus occasionally. they're just hard to setup (animation is fucking weird) and slow as fuck.
If......
I know I was never good but I never remember a single time where the flying crow did me any good. It kept dying accomplishing maybe 20% of what it should have..
User avatar
Finland princeofkabul
Pro Player
NWC LAN Top 8EPL Reigning Champs
Posts: 2372
Joined: Feb 28, 2015
ESO: Princeofkabul
Location: In retirement home with Sam and Vic

Re: Is the porcelain tower really better than the academy?

Post by princeofkabul »

aaryngend wrote:
princeofkabul wrote:honestly crows are fine if you get them to setup, people usually just don't care much about them and charge them into 20 hus occasionally. they're just hard to setup (animation is fucking weird) and slow as fuck.
If......
I know I was never good but I never remember a single time where the flying crow did me any good. It kept dying accomplishing maybe 20% of what it should have..
sounds about crow pls buff zoi
Chairman of Washed Up clan
Leader of the Shady Swedes
Team Manager of the Blockhouse Boomers

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests

Which top 10 players do you wish to see listed?

All-time

Active last two weeks

Active last month

Supremacy

Treaty

Official

ESOC Patch

Treaty Patch

1v1 Elo

2v2 Elo

3v3 Elo

Power Rating

Which streams do you wish to see listed?

Twitch

Age of Empires III

Age of Empires IV