Goodspeed wrote:Or maybe I'm getting tired of responding to someone whose only coherent input is "billionaires bad".
well. they are, inherently bad
There should not be any dollar billionaires, I agree with Sanders on this. Wtf should they spend all those money on, when so many ppl have a hard time to meet ends?
Hippocrits are the worst of animals. I love elifants.
Goodspeed wrote:Or maybe I'm getting tired of responding to someone whose only coherent input is "billionaires bad".
well. they are, inherently bad
There should not be any dollar billionaires, I agree with Sanders on this. Wtf should they spend all those money on, when so many ppl have a hard time to meet ends?
I'm honestly curious, what do you think the max amount of money one person can have should be?
Goodspeed wrote:I agree that there shouldn't be any billionaires, for the record.
Okay, what do you think the max should be?
There doesnāt need to be a āmaxā to ones personal wealth, ie. there doesnāt need to be a point where someone is being taxed 100% of his income. It just needs to be 90%.
and all of those money has only one place to go, to the stock market, who is the only thing surging these days. (biggest bubble you have ever seen). The trillion-dollar the FED printed out over the 4 last weeks, are only to keep the marked saturated, because the Big Banks are starting to get really worried.
so you tell me smart pants @Goodspeed. This bubble will burst this year or the next one. Who would you trust in the white house, Butti or Sanders?
Hippocrits are the worst of animals. I love elifants.
fightinfrenchman wrote:What if the majority of the person's money is held in stocks, like with most billionaires
Why would that change anything? Wherever your value is, if it's over X and it increases, the increase should be taxed Y.
Where X is around $1b and Y ~95%
iwillspankyou wrote:and all of those money has only one place to go, to the stock market, who is the only thing surging these days. (biggest bubble you have ever seen). The trillion-dollar the FED printed out over the 4 last weeks, are only to keep the marked saturated, because the Big Banks are starting to get really worried.
so you tell me smart pants @Goodspeed. This bubble will burst this year or the next one. Who would you trust in the white house, Butti or Sanders?
Amsel_ wrote:What happened to cause buttboi to surge in the Iowa polls?
Iowa being full of white people
Politics has been getting weird. I was sure that a republican would be the first to use a DNA to showing how White they are as an argument in support of their candidacy, but it ended up being Warren.