That may be true but the entire city of flint hates him for poisoning them and their children, pretty important place to turn out the vote.XeeleeFlower wrote:Tbf, Snyder was well loved by Republicans and he wrote a rather scathing piece against Trump a few days ago.n0el wrote:Biden is actively trying to lose Michigan. I cannot believe he’s promoting a Snyder endorsement. Disgusting.
US Politics Megathread
Re: 2020 US Elections
mad cuz bad
Re: 2020 US Elections
It's a trade. Lose some, gain some. But Flint is 1% of the population, so he's not losing that many votes over it.
- fightinfrenchman
- Ninja
- Posts: 23508
- Joined: Oct 17, 2015
- Location: Pennsylvania
Re: 2020 US Elections
Hillary lost Michigan by .23%, about 10k votesGoodspeed wrote:It's a trade. Lose some, gain some. But Flint is 1% of the population, so he's not losing that many votes over it.
Dromedary Scone Mix is not Alone Mix
Re: 2020 US Elections
gibson wrote:We'd be two months away from president elect mike bloomberg.Amsel_ wrote:I wonder how things are going in the Bloomberg (pbuh) timeline.
Re: 2020 US Elections
Hillary underperformed Obama by 38000 votes in flint, enough to swing the state.Goodspeed wrote:It's a trade. Lose some, gain some. But Flint is 1% of the population, so he's not losing that many votes over it.
mad cuz bad
- Riotcoke
- Retired Contributor
- Posts: 4088
- Joined: May 7, 2019
- ESO: Riotcoke
- Location: Dorsetshire
- Clan: UwU
Re: 2020 US Elections
Why isn't Micheal Moore running, he bitches about everything surely he'd make an amazing president!
twitch.tv/stangoesdeepTV
Re: 2020 US Elections
the man hasn't run for decades...Riotcoke wrote:Why isn't Micheal Moore running, he bitches about everything surely he'd make an amazing president!
Re: 2020 US Elections
Irrelevant? Did you miss the "lose some, gain some" part?fightinfrenchman wrote:Hillary lost Michigan by .23%, about 10k votesGoodspeed wrote:It's a trade. Lose some, gain some. But Flint is 1% of the population, so he's not losing that many votes over it.
If you do something that potentially alienates 1% of the pop and potentially wins votes from the other 99%, how is that necessarily a bad move?
Re: 2020 US Elections
Sigh how did you both come up with the same irrelevant point?n0el wrote:Hillary underperformed Obama by 38000 votes in flint, enough to swing the state.Goodspeed wrote:It's a trade. Lose some, gain some. But Flint is 1% of the population, so he's not losing that many votes over it.
Re: 2020 US Elections
100 people. 49 of them like apples, 50 are indifferent and 1 dislikes apples. You can either give all of them an apple or none of them.
What do you do?
What do you do?
Re: 2020 US Elections
You tell the one person who doesn't like apples to conform or else.
Re: 2020 US Elections
Well, I think it’s a bad strategy to alienate safe votes that give you a proven path to victory in order to maybe get some votes that may or not exist.Goodspeed wrote:Sigh how did you both come up with the same irrelevant point?n0el wrote:Hillary underperformed Obama by 38000 votes in flint, enough to swing the state.Goodspeed wrote:It's a trade. Lose some, gain some. But Flint is 1% of the population, so he's not losing that many votes over it.
mad cuz bad
Re: 2020 US Elections
"Proven". Nothing is proven, it's all just maximizing odds. I assume it polled well.
Re: 2020 US Elections
Okay, historically proven. Whitmer in 2018 ran up the numbers in the inner cities like Obama, and crushed. Why would you change the strategy for optics? I can assure you that Snyder is cancer to inner city people in Michigan.Goodspeed wrote:"Proven". Nothing is proven, it's all just maximizing odds. I assume it polled well.
mad cuz bad
Re: 2020 US Elections
You're awfully confident for someone who doesn't have access to the mountains of data the campaign has access to. Campaigns tend not to make decisions like this willy nilly
Re: 2020 US Elections
Campaign data said Clinton had Michigan and Wisconsin in the bag in 2016. I’d rather trust actual election results.Goodspeed wrote:You're awfully confident for someone who doesn't have access to the mountains of data the campaign has access to. Campaigns tend not to make decisions like this willy nilly
mad cuz bad
Re: 2020 US Elections
... from another year. Yeah it's a bit arrogant to think you know better than the campaign but you're entitled to an opinion I guess.
Re: 2020 US Elections
Ofc it’s my opinion based on available evidence. The reason we are in this position is over-reliance in polling. I don’t think 4 years changed that. Either way, I’d be willing to bet a substantial amount of money that accepting Snyder’s endorsement has no specific polling data to support it.
mad cuz bad
Re: 2020 US Elections
In memory of
“To love the journey is to accept no such end. I have found, through painful experience, that the most important step a person can take is always the next one.”
- spanky4ever
- Gendarme
- Posts: 8390
- Joined: Apr 13, 2015
Re: 2020 US Elections
China is selling off US tresurey bonds - for 3 straight months in a row. You might not have heard about it?
http://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/china-reduce ... -1.1153421
what does it mean though?
Full economic war? or is it that the trust in US dollar is at a bottom low? I mean, who can blame other nations for dumping dollars, when the FED just keeps printing them "out of thin air - like there is no tomorrow" and it seems to be the only option they have to not let the economic plummit down in to a rabbit hole. What is so stupid about this, is that all the money goes it to the stockmarked, and not supporting the consumers who could actually upheld the value of the stocks. No consumers, no value - EZ as that. it is all an artificual stimulus that will not last - even though Trump keeps on pumping the mantra that US eco is "booming". Most ppl do not feel it!"
http://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/china-reduce ... -1.1153421
what does it mean though?
Full economic war? or is it that the trust in US dollar is at a bottom low? I mean, who can blame other nations for dumping dollars, when the FED just keeps printing them "out of thin air - like there is no tomorrow" and it seems to be the only option they have to not let the economic plummit down in to a rabbit hole. What is so stupid about this, is that all the money goes it to the stockmarked, and not supporting the consumers who could actually upheld the value of the stocks. No consumers, no value - EZ as that. it is all an artificual stimulus that will not last - even though Trump keeps on pumping the mantra that US eco is "booming". Most ppl do not feel it!"
Hippocrits are the worst of animals. I love elifants.
- spanky4ever
- Gendarme
- Posts: 8390
- Joined: Apr 13, 2015
Re: 2020 US Elections
How is this important to the election?
2 things
1.Trump is desperat, trying to uphold the idea that US eco is "da best ever"
2.Biden, if he win the election, will inherent a disaster when it comes to the eco, and struggle to bring it back to some kind of level between input and output.
Yeah - heard this story before - have we not?
2 things
1.Trump is desperat, trying to uphold the idea that US eco is "da best ever"
2.Biden, if he win the election, will inherent a disaster when it comes to the eco, and struggle to bring it back to some kind of level between input and output.
Yeah - heard this story before - have we not?
Hippocrits are the worst of animals. I love elifants.
Re: 2020 US Elections
China divesting itself of US bonds is a move that goes beyond any particular figure being in the White house. After the 2008 financial bloodbath, both China and Russia made a pact they will slowly but gradually replace the dollar in their international transactions. This can't be done too fast, or else it could backfire against them.
The world is still awash in dollars and lots of big banks still need dollars just to be able to trade stuff or service older credits.
This is a big discussion with lots of variables, not sure it's worth having here. Just wanted to point out that this goes way beyond whoever might be US president, it will have a big impact on how the international system and order work. A world in which the dollar carries less weight will be a world in which US influence will be much more reduced, compared to now. This has both some advantages and disadvantages for the US, actually having your currency accepted as a reserve and global trading currency forces you to always have a trade deficit with the rest of the world. And the Fed needs to honour its commitment to keep supplying the world with dollars.
If the dollar recedes from global exchanges, other currencies need to fill that void (and to start running a trade deficit with the others). Otherwise, this could lead to a reduction in global trade due to lack of means of exchange. I think China will try to assert its own currency as a means of exchange, at least in bilateral trade, for a start. Same for Russia. The Euro is already the 2nd reserve currency of the world, but it doesn't have as much influence in trade, because oil trading is done in dollars. If an oil exchange is established in euros too... there will be a lot of fretting in Washington.
The world is still awash in dollars and lots of big banks still need dollars just to be able to trade stuff or service older credits.
This is a big discussion with lots of variables, not sure it's worth having here. Just wanted to point out that this goes way beyond whoever might be US president, it will have a big impact on how the international system and order work. A world in which the dollar carries less weight will be a world in which US influence will be much more reduced, compared to now. This has both some advantages and disadvantages for the US, actually having your currency accepted as a reserve and global trading currency forces you to always have a trade deficit with the rest of the world. And the Fed needs to honour its commitment to keep supplying the world with dollars.
If the dollar recedes from global exchanges, other currencies need to fill that void (and to start running a trade deficit with the others). Otherwise, this could lead to a reduction in global trade due to lack of means of exchange. I think China will try to assert its own currency as a means of exchange, at least in bilateral trade, for a start. Same for Russia. The Euro is already the 2nd reserve currency of the world, but it doesn't have as much influence in trade, because oil trading is done in dollars. If an oil exchange is established in euros too... there will be a lot of fretting in Washington.
Re: 2020 US Elections
Also @spanky4ever even if all countries and banks who hold US debt sold it, it wouldn't be the end of the world. The biggest holders of US debt are their own investment funds, pensions funds, primary dealer banks, etc.
It would force the USA to maybe cut its deficit, if their internal market is unable to absorb that surplus that the rest of the world would be unwilling to buy anymore.
That could mean less money for the military or cutting other expenses to keep the military funded. Big crisis looming ahead for the USA if external buyers of its debt start throwing it overboard.
PS. Though some ppl like Amsel have a different take on this. I believe he thinks the US government has no limit whatsoever on spending (the legal ceiling on spending is just a political sideshow for the congress to make a big fuss about that decision) and the Fed is just a cashflow/inflation manager.
It would force the USA to maybe cut its deficit, if their internal market is unable to absorb that surplus that the rest of the world would be unwilling to buy anymore.
That could mean less money for the military or cutting other expenses to keep the military funded. Big crisis looming ahead for the USA if external buyers of its debt start throwing it overboard.
PS. Though some ppl like Amsel have a different take on this. I believe he thinks the US government has no limit whatsoever on spending (the legal ceiling on spending is just a political sideshow for the congress to make a big fuss about that decision) and the Fed is just a cashflow/inflation manager.
- fedjahnson
- Skirmisher
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Mar 27, 2020
- ESO: gewitter_
- Location: Ohio
Re: 2020 US Elections
@Dolan the holders of the most US debt are private investors.
The earth is hollow-Sircallen
Re: 2020 US Elections
Who might have an incentive to keep the US stable in order to avoid shockwaves destroying the world economy and, thereby, their further investments.fedjahnson wrote:@Dolan the holders of the most US debt are private investors.
Whatever is written above: this is no financial advice.
Beati pauperes spiritu.
Beati pauperes spiritu.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests