Notre Dame.
-
- Ninja
- Posts: 14364
- Joined: Mar 26, 2015
Re: Notre Dame.
Just imagine how much longer the queues will be once it's rebuilt!
-
- Ninja
- Posts: 14364
- Joined: Mar 26, 2015
Re: Notre Dame.
Mr_Bramboy wrote:umeu wrote:which it seems like it wasn't based on what the French government is telling its people and the world
The project lead has also confirmed that electricity was shut off during the construction
Construction fire is made by gas, boy
- fightinfrenchman
- Ninja
- Posts: 23506
- Joined: Oct 17, 2015
- Location: Pennsylvania
Re: Notre Dame.
deleted_user wrote:Mr_Bramboy wrote:umeu wrote:which it seems like it wasn't based on what the French government is telling its people and the world
The project lead has also confirmed that electricity was shut off during the construction
Construction fire is made by gas, boy
How do I know you're not part of the Jewish/Muslim/Globalist/Illuminati conspiracy to cover up what actually happened???
Dromedary Scone Mix is not Alone Mix
Re: Notre Dame.
Jet fuel can't melt wooden beams.
-
- Ninja
- Posts: 13004
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
-
- Jaeger
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: May 16, 2015
- ESO: Hyperactive Jam
Re: Notre Dame.
Hey, that was me. Sorry guys I just wanted to get a better view.
Re: Notre Dame.
I think I posted a pic which showed how that 800 years old wood from the Notre Dame roof looked like. It looked almost petrified.
It has accumulated so much dust from the environment over 8 centuries, this thing would have taken forever to catch fire.
So I think the architect who participated in the restoration efforts some years ago makes a good point. That kind of wood couldn't have caught fire so quickly. There's something fishy about this sequence of events, going from a false alarm at 6-ish PM and then an actually confirmed alarm a few tens of minutes later. If this wood takes a long time to catch fire, how could it combust so fast?
I mean, if you want to venture into conspiracy territory, you could think of a wide range of scenarios, some of them quite crazy. I'm sure some people might even think some pro-Macron mignions might have created this event in order to distract the French people from the yellow vests protests and take the wind out of the their sails.
I don't find any of these conspiracy scenarios believable yet, but it's quite equally hard to believe that petrified wood would catch fire so fast and spread quickly to every corner of the roof and spire.
Again, Notre Dame had 2 people who were permanently there monitoring the roof for any potential fire incidents. And a whole system of sensors that was supposed to detect any incipient fire. Then there's a false alarm and then the whole roof catches fire so fast, when the firemen arrive it's too late to simply stop it.
Something doesn't quite add up here.
PS. Also, all this stuff happens a few days before the Catholic Easter starts. And some days later, there's a huge terror attack on Catholic churches in Sri Lanka.
It has accumulated so much dust from the environment over 8 centuries, this thing would have taken forever to catch fire.
So I think the architect who participated in the restoration efforts some years ago makes a good point. That kind of wood couldn't have caught fire so quickly. There's something fishy about this sequence of events, going from a false alarm at 6-ish PM and then an actually confirmed alarm a few tens of minutes later. If this wood takes a long time to catch fire, how could it combust so fast?
I mean, if you want to venture into conspiracy territory, you could think of a wide range of scenarios, some of them quite crazy. I'm sure some people might even think some pro-Macron mignions might have created this event in order to distract the French people from the yellow vests protests and take the wind out of the their sails.
I don't find any of these conspiracy scenarios believable yet, but it's quite equally hard to believe that petrified wood would catch fire so fast and spread quickly to every corner of the roof and spire.
Again, Notre Dame had 2 people who were permanently there monitoring the roof for any potential fire incidents. And a whole system of sensors that was supposed to detect any incipient fire. Then there's a false alarm and then the whole roof catches fire so fast, when the firemen arrive it's too late to simply stop it.
Something doesn't quite add up here.
PS. Also, all this stuff happens a few days before the Catholic Easter starts. And some days later, there's a huge terror attack on Catholic churches in Sri Lanka.
- fightinfrenchman
- Ninja
- Posts: 23506
- Joined: Oct 17, 2015
- Location: Pennsylvania
Re: Notre Dame.
What would it take for you to believe it was an accident?
Dromedary Scone Mix is not Alone Mix
-
- Jaeger
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: May 16, 2015
- ESO: Hyperactive Jam
Re: Notre Dame.
The only way to prove that is wasn't on purpose is if the perpetrators tell us themselves that they didn't do it.fightinfrenchman wrote:What would it take for you to believe it was an accident?
-
- Ninja
- Posts: 14364
- Joined: Mar 26, 2015
Re: Notre Dame.
Jam wrote:The only way to prove that is wasn't on purpose is if the perpetrators tell us themselves that they didn't do it.fightinfrenchman wrote:What would it take for you to believe it was an accident?
Do something great, Jam!
- fightinfrenchman
- Ninja
- Posts: 23506
- Joined: Oct 17, 2015
- Location: Pennsylvania
Re: Notre Dame.
fightinfrenchman wrote:What would it take for you to believe it was an accident?
Why should I believe any particular hypothesis if it hasn't been satisfactorily proven yet?
As I said, I don't believe any scenario yet, I'm just saying something doesn't add up in this story. Why should I believe in a narrative that is very convenient for your point of view? I'm keeping all options open.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests