Not a full response. Some of those questions require somewhat lengthy answers.iNcog wrote: ↑04 Sep 2022, 15:01So are not having this discussion? I'm asking how the demonstration of God's existence is objective. Thereafter we can make an argument as to whether morality can have objective foundation in theism. Which it really can't. Even if God did exist, why do humans get to decide or interpret God's will? That doesn't make sense. That, on top of the fact that of course God's existence is really based off of belief more than anything else (which is human cognition... something lejend argues is flawed to begin with).
Firstly, God is not a dependant being. God exists whether or not you or I believe he exists. And when I say God I mean the triune God who has revealed himself in the bible.
You wish to decide whether God exists by using some measurement or criteria. But who are you (or I) to decide by what rationale it will be decided if God exists? Suppose you found he didn't exist, how would you know that you had not used the wrong metric? Perhaps if you had used another metric you would have realised that in actuality he does exist.
My point is to say that apart from God's self revelation you are left not knowing. And to claim he does not exist, is to be left at the mercy of subjectivity, uncertainty and self-delusion.
God exists. He has revealed himself in the bible. Believe (i.e accept as truth claims) what he has said.