A question for the mathematicians on this site

This is for discussions about news, politics, sports, other games, culture, philosophy etc.
User avatar
Netherlands edeholland
ESOC Community Team
Donator 01
Posts: 5033
Joined: Feb 11, 2015
ESO: edeholland
GameRanger ID: 4053888
Clan: ESOC

A question for the mathematicians on this site

Post by edeholland »

Hey all, I have a question inspired by a bar I visited not too long ago. The bar has a lucky wheel. For 10 euros, you can spin the wheel once, and you get the prize that you spin. Possible prizes include: four shots of vodka, a bottle of prosecco, 5 beers, etc. There one prize that's different from the rest: it gives you four shots and you may spin the wheel again. This means that's in possible in theory to spin that specific prize 5 times in a row and get 20 free shots.

However, this is their advertisement: Image Translated it says: you can win an infinite amount of shots or a bottle of prosecco.

My question is the following: is it actually possible to win an infinite amount of shots? Let's say there are 16 different prizez you can win. If you calculate 1/16 * 1/16 * 1/16 * 1/16 ..... doesn't that equal 0? Doesn't that mean there is a chance of 0 to actually win an infinite amount of shots?

I'm currently discussing this with a few friends but nobody is actually good at proofing this, so I hope @RefluxSemantic or @iNcog or @Goodspeed can share their thoughts.
No Flag RefluxSemantic
Gendarme
Posts: 5996
Joined: Jun 4, 2019

Re: A question for the mathematicians on this site

Post by RefluxSemantic »

I believe that 1/x in the limit of x->infinity indeed does go to zero.
User avatar
Netherlands Mr_Bramboy
Retired Contributor
Donator 01
Posts: 8219
Joined: Feb 26, 2015
ESO: [VOC] Bram
Location: Amsterdam

Re: A question for the mathematicians on this site

Post by Mr_Bramboy »

edeholland wrote:My question is the following: is it actually possible to win an infinite amount of shots? Let's say there are 16 different prices you can win. If you calculate 1/16 * 1/16 * 1/16 * 1/16 ..... doesn't that equal 0? Doesn't that mean there is a chance of 0 to actually win an infinite amount of shots?
Your maths are wrong. If you want to calculate the chance of spinning the free spin, you do not only factor in the chance of that circumstance (1/16) but also the chance of any other circumstance (15/16).

The chance of one free spin is (1/16 * 15/16) = 0.058.
User avatar
Latvia harcha
Gendarme
Posts: 5141
Joined: Jul 2, 2015
ESO: hatamoto_samurai

Re: A question for the mathematicians on this site

Post by harcha »

Mr_Bramboy wrote:
edeholland wrote:My question is the following: is it actually possible to win an infinite amount of shots? Let's say there are 16 different prices you can win. If you calculate 1/16 * 1/16 * 1/16 * 1/16 ..... doesn't that equal 0? Doesn't that mean there is a chance of 0 to actually win an infinite amount of shots?
Your maths are wrong. If you want to calculate the chance of spinning the free spin, you do not only factor in the chance of that circumstance (1/16) but also the chance of any other circumstance (15/16).

The chance of one free spin is (1/16 * 15/16) = 0.058.
could you explain why, i feel dumb reading this

also prize not price wtf @edeholland
POC wrote:Also I most likely know a whole lot more than you.
POC wrote:Also as an objective third party, and near 100% accuracy of giving correct information, I would say my opinions are more reliable than yours.
User avatar
Netherlands Goodspeed
Retired Contributor
Posts: 13006
Joined: Feb 27, 2015

Re: A question for the mathematicians on this site

  • Quote

Post by Goodspeed »

Mr_Bramboy wrote:
edeholland wrote:My question is the following: is it actually possible to win an infinite amount of shots? Let's say there are 16 different prices you can win. If you calculate 1/16 * 1/16 * 1/16 * 1/16 ..... doesn't that equal 0? Doesn't that mean there is a chance of 0 to actually win an infinite amount of shots?
Your maths are wrong. If you want to calculate the chance of spinning the free spin, you do not only factor in the chance of that circumstance (1/16) but also the chance of any other circumstance (15/16).

The chance of one free spin is (1/16 * 15/16) = 0.058.
??

That would be the chance of getting the free spin first, and then anything else the second time you spin it.
France iNcog
Ninja
Posts: 13236
Joined: Mar 7, 2015

Re: A question for the mathematicians on this site

Post by iNcog »

-- deleted post --

Reason: on request (off-topic bulk delete)
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/incog_aoe
Garja wrote:
20 Mar 2020, 21:46
I just hope DE is not going to implement all of the EP changes. Right now it is a big clusterfuck.
User avatar
Netherlands Mr_Bramboy
Retired Contributor
Donator 01
Posts: 8219
Joined: Feb 26, 2015
ESO: [VOC] Bram
Location: Amsterdam

Re: A question for the mathematicians on this site

Post by Mr_Bramboy »

Goodspeed wrote:
Mr_Bramboy wrote:
edeholland wrote:My question is the following: is it actually possible to win an infinite amount of shots? Let's say there are 16 different prices you can win. If you calculate 1/16 * 1/16 * 1/16 * 1/16 ..... doesn't that equal 0? Doesn't that mean there is a chance of 0 to actually win an infinite amount of shots?
Your maths are wrong. If you want to calculate the chance of spinning the free spin, you do not only factor in the chance of that circumstance (1/16) but also the chance of any other circumstance (15/16).

The chance of one free spin is (1/16 * 15/16) = 0.058.
??

That would be the chance of getting the free spin first, and then anything else the second time you spin it.
Wasn't that the question? Maybe I understood it wrongly.
User avatar
Latvia harcha
Gendarme
Posts: 5141
Joined: Jul 2, 2015
ESO: hatamoto_samurai

Re: A question for the mathematicians on this site

Post by harcha »

what i think ede was saying is that one of the outcomes of a spin includes both of the following: 4 shots and another spin, so getting infinite shots would mean to infinitely land on this option
POC wrote:Also I most likely know a whole lot more than you.
POC wrote:Also as an objective third party, and near 100% accuracy of giving correct information, I would say my opinions are more reliable than yours.
User avatar
Netherlands Goodspeed
Retired Contributor
Posts: 13006
Joined: Feb 27, 2015

Re: A question for the mathematicians on this site

Post by Goodspeed »

Mr_Bramboy wrote:
Goodspeed wrote:
Show hidden quotes
??

That would be the chance of getting the free spin first, and then anything else the second time you spin it.
Wasn't that the question? Maybe I understood it wrongly.
The question is can you win an infinite amount of shots.

It would depend on whether 1/16 ^ infinity = 0, which appears to be the case: https://math.stackexchange.com/question ... s-infinity
France iNcog
Ninja
Posts: 13236
Joined: Mar 7, 2015

Re: A question for the mathematicians on this site

Post by iNcog »

-- deleted post --

Reason: on request (off-topic bulk delete)
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/incog_aoe
Garja wrote:
20 Mar 2020, 21:46
I just hope DE is not going to implement all of the EP changes. Right now it is a big clusterfuck.
User avatar
Kiribati princeofcarthage
Retired Contributor
Posts: 8861
Joined: Aug 28, 2015
Location: Milky Way!

Re: A question for the mathematicians on this site

Post by princeofcarthage »

It never becomes absolute zero, it tends to be zero
Fine line to something great is a strange change.
France iNcog
Ninja
Posts: 13236
Joined: Mar 7, 2015

Re: A question for the mathematicians on this site

Post by iNcog »

-- deleted post --

Reason: on request (off-topic bulk delete)
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/incog_aoe
Garja wrote:
20 Mar 2020, 21:46
I just hope DE is not going to implement all of the EP changes. Right now it is a big clusterfuck.
No Flag RefluxSemantic
Gendarme
Posts: 5996
Joined: Jun 4, 2019

Re: A question for the mathematicians on this site

Post by RefluxSemantic »

iNcog wrote:
Goodspeed wrote:
Show hidden quotes
The question is can you win an infinite amount of shots.

It would depend on whether 1/16 ^ infinity = 0, which appears to be the case: https://math.stackexchange.com/question ... s-infinity
at what value of n for 1/16 ^ n does it become 0?
infinite
User avatar
Netherlands edeholland
ESOC Community Team
Donator 01
Posts: 5033
Joined: Feb 11, 2015
ESO: edeholland
GameRanger ID: 4053888
Clan: ESOC

Re: A question for the mathematicians on this site

Post by edeholland »

princeofcarthage wrote:It never becomes absolute zero, it tends to be zero
If it never becomes zero, does that mean it's possible to win an infinite amount of shots?
User avatar
Kiribati princeofcarthage
Retired Contributor
Posts: 8861
Joined: Aug 28, 2015
Location: Milky Way!

Re: A question for the mathematicians on this site

Post by princeofcarthage »

edeholland wrote:
princeofcarthage wrote:It never becomes absolute zero, it tends to be zero
If it never becomes zero, does that mean it's possible to win an infinite amount of shots?
Mathematically yes, practically probably no.
Fine line to something great is a strange change.
User avatar
Netherlands edeholland
ESOC Community Team
Donator 01
Posts: 5033
Joined: Feb 11, 2015
ESO: edeholland
GameRanger ID: 4053888
Clan: ESOC

Re: A question for the mathematicians on this site

Post by edeholland »

princeofcarthage wrote:
edeholland wrote:
princeofcarthage wrote:It never becomes absolute zero, it tends to be zero
If it never becomes zero, does that mean it's possible to win an infinite amount of shots?
Mathematically yes, practically probably no.
The issue with that is I can rephrase it to say "With infinite luck, you can win infinite shots" which would mean that it's not possible to win infinite shots.
No Flag RefluxSemantic
Gendarme
Posts: 5996
Joined: Jun 4, 2019

Re: A question for the mathematicians on this site

Post by RefluxSemantic »

Mathematically this is the question:
f (x) = 1/(16^x)
What is f(x) in the limit of x -> inf

And the answer to that is that
lim x->inf (f(x)) = 0
User avatar
Kiribati princeofcarthage
Retired Contributor
Posts: 8861
Joined: Aug 28, 2015
Location: Milky Way!

Re: A question for the mathematicians on this site

Post by princeofcarthage »

Well it isn't exactly luck based, weather the spin will stop on infinite shots depends on factors, most of which are beyond absolute human control. Hence it gives the impression of luck. If you could for ex control the circumstances with absolute certainty say for ex with a robot, in a controlled environment you can get infinite free shots.
Fine line to something great is a strange change.
No Flag RefluxSemantic
Gendarme
Posts: 5996
Joined: Jun 4, 2019

Re: A question for the mathematicians on this site

Post by RefluxSemantic »

No, the chance that you get infinite shots is zero.
User avatar
No Flag fightinfrenchman
Ninja
Donator 04
Posts: 23506
Joined: Oct 17, 2015
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: A question for the mathematicians on this site

Post by fightinfrenchman »

princeofcarthage wrote:Well it isn't exactly luck based, weather the spin will stop on infinite shots depends on factors, most of which are beyond absolute human control. Hence it gives the impression of luck. If you could for ex control the circumstances with absolute certainty say for ex with a robot, in a controlled environment you can get infinite free shots.
Getting the spin right every time would be difficult if you're doing 4 shots of vodka every time.
Dromedary Scone Mix is not Alone Mix
Image
France iNcog
Ninja
Posts: 13236
Joined: Mar 7, 2015

Re: A question for the mathematicians on this site

Post by iNcog »

-- deleted post --

Reason: on request (off-topic bulk delete)
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/incog_aoe
Garja wrote:
20 Mar 2020, 21:46
I just hope DE is not going to implement all of the EP changes. Right now it is a big clusterfuck.
No Flag RefluxSemantic
Gendarme
Posts: 5996
Joined: Jun 4, 2019

Re: A question for the mathematicians on this site

Post by RefluxSemantic »

iNcog wrote:
RefluxSemantic wrote:
Show hidden quotes
infinite
that's not a real number, it's an idea

I'm sure there would be a very basic way to mathematically demonstrate that

Maybe like

(inf + 1) - inf is not equal to 1
Yes. In maths 1/infinite is 0.
User avatar
Kiribati princeofcarthage
Retired Contributor
Posts: 8861
Joined: Aug 28, 2015
Location: Milky Way!

Re: A question for the mathematicians on this site

Post by princeofcarthage »

Well it's for practical purposes of solving equations. The correct answer is infinitesimal, which is extremely small or close to zero. However it's never absolute zero
Fine line to something great is a strange change.
France iNcog
Ninja
Posts: 13236
Joined: Mar 7, 2015

Re: A question for the mathematicians on this site

Post by iNcog »

-- deleted post --

Reason: on request (off-topic bulk delete)
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/incog_aoe
Garja wrote:
20 Mar 2020, 21:46
I just hope DE is not going to implement all of the EP changes. Right now it is a big clusterfuck.
User avatar
Kiribati princeofcarthage
Retired Contributor
Posts: 8861
Joined: Aug 28, 2015
Location: Milky Way!

Re: A question for the mathematicians on this site

Post by princeofcarthage »

The correct possibility is simply 1/16^n where n = infinity, I don't understand why it is complicated more than it should be.
Fine line to something great is a strange change.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests

Which top 10 players do you wish to see listed?

All-time

Active last two weeks

Active last month

Supremacy

Treaty

Official

ESOC Patch

Treaty Patch

1v1 Elo

2v2 Elo

3v3 Elo

Power Rating

Which streams do you wish to see listed?

Twitch

Age of Empires III

Age of Empires IV