But I CBA to make a fully fleshed out argument with references and stuff. Believe whatever you will. I guess my time is just as precious as yours if you don't want to look at the findings from that study I quoted. The data shows clearly that belief that you receive a nicotine substitute can be a stronger motivator to cut down on the number of cigs/day than knowing you get placebo, irrespective of whether you receive nicotine substitutes or just placebo. Seriously, if you get placebo and your rate of cutting down cigs is still about the same... I don't know what else would convince you that you conditioned yourself into needing a substance to alleviate stress.
If someone gives you something to smoke that has almost zero nicotine but you believe it's regular levels of nicotine, you'd still feel stress relief. Just because you formed an association between that burnt tar scent and stress alleviation, that's enough to trick your mind into thinking you are taking in nicotine, lol.
I mean, this has already been tested: smoking cigs with almost no nicotine at all reduces nicotine craving about as much as smoking cigs with a normal concentration of nicotine.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... 5705000912
Placebo gets similar rates of reducing tobacco craving as the real thing. The mind = magic.Existing evidence supports the notion that nicotine delivery and recentness of smoking mediate the effects of smoking, including decreases in tobacco craving. However, smoking placebo (denicotinized) cigarettes decreases tobacco craving after overnight abstinence. The present study tested whether the recentness of smoking was an important determinant in the ability of a placebo cigarette to reduce tobacco craving. Placebo (0.07 mg nicotine) and conventional (1.1 mg nicotine) cigarettes were used in a spaced smoking paradigm. In six experimental sessions lasting 240 min, subjects smoked either a placebo or conventional nicotine cigarette in intervals of either 30, 60, or 240 min. Heart rate (HR), exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) levels, and subjective (Schuh–Stitzer, QSU) measures of tobacco craving were obtained throughout the spaced smoking paradigm. HR and CO levels increased after smoking both types of cigarettes. Increasing the interval since the last cigarette significantly (p < 0.001) increased the baseline values of tobacco craving. Smoking either the placebo or the conventional cigarette caused a significant (p < 0.01) reduction in the craving score after smoking. However, the nicotine yield of the cigarette did not influence these patterns. It is concluded that acute tobacco cravings can be repeatedly diminished with cigarettes that do not deliver nicotine.