US riots

[fightinfrenchman]

Best case scenario - Reinstate @Goodspeed but don't interfere in the slightest with how he's running off-topic, remove junk posts (I.e Ear), unban dolan.

Why do you want to censor me? Just debate my posts instead

[Cometk]

Goodspeed wasn’t removed from his position, he resigned

[Goodspeed]

Best case scenario - Reinstate @Goodspeed but don't interfere in the slightest with how he's running off-topic, remove junk posts (I.e Ear), unban dolan.

Is Dolan actually banned?

[Riotcoke]

Best case scenario - Reinstate @Goodspeed but don't interfere in the slightest with how he's running off-topic, remove junk posts (I.e Ear), unban dolan.

Why do you want to censor me? Just debate my posts instead

I don't use the political threads, you post in my threads about a possible EU lan with absolute shit, so yes i should censor you.

[Riotcoke]

Best case scenario - Reinstate @Goodspeed but don't interfere in the slightest with how he's running off-topic, remove junk posts (I.e Ear), unban dolan.

Is Dolan actually banned?

Yes Noel banned him.

[Sargsyan]

Dolan is banned

[Riotcoke]

Goodspeed wasn’t removed from his position, he resigned

He resigned as people were interfering with his moderation, simple as it should just be kept to mart.

[edeholland]

Best case scenario - Reinstate @Goodspeed but don't interfere in the slightest with how he's running off-topic

That would be best, but it has been proven hard to enforce.

[Ashvin]

it feels like pecelot-hleung era already

[iNcog]

-- deleted post --

[knusch]

This thread has turned into cry babies who don't like their opinion being disputed.

it has always been exactly that xD

Free speech is all good but comes with the caveat that we shouldnt allow hate on the boards. it's a fairly simple line that I dont see too much issue drawing

as long as @fightinfrenchman isn't the one to define "hate speech", coz for some reason he is not able to google the definition of words....

[princeofcarthage]

Free speech is all good but comes with the caveat that we shouldnt allow hate on the boards. it's a fairly simple line that I dont see too much issue drawing

Good point but 99% posts aren't hate. Most hate posts gets deleted anyways.

[chris1089]

Free speech is all good but comes with the caveat that we shouldnt allow hate on the boards. it's a fairly simple line that I dont see too much issue drawing

Do you have two conflicting definitions of free for different situations?

[n0el]

Free speech is all good but comes with the caveat that we shouldnt allow hate on the boards. it's a fairly simple line that I dont see too much issue drawing

Do you have two conflicting definitions of free for different situations?

it's free speech for me to personally attack people on the forum and call them derogatory names, is that okay?

[chris1089]

Free speech is all good but comes with the caveat that we shouldnt allow hate on the boards. it's a fairly simple line that I dont see too much issue drawing

Do you have two conflicting definitions of free for different situations?

it's free speech for me to personally attack people on the forum and call them derogatory names, is that okay?

If that's what you call hate, do you have two conflicting definitions of hate that you use for different situations?

[n0el]

Show hidden quotes

Free speech is all good but comes with the caveat that we shouldnt allow hate on the boards. it's a fairly simple line that I dont see too much issue drawing

Do you have two conflicting definitions of free for different situations?

it's free speech for me to personally attack people on the forum and call them derogatory names, is that okay?

If that's what you call hate, do you have two conflicting definitions of hate that you use for different situations?

No, I think attacking an individual or a group of individuals is the same thing.

[knusch]

it's free speech for me to personally attack people on the forum and call them derogatory names, is that okay?

No, I think attacking an individual or a group of individuals is the same thing.

ehm, does calling ppl racist when it obvsly does not apply count?

[007Salt]

Biden will most likely get elected and then hopefully this bullshit will end.

Trump is not the man for this type of a job obviously to restore peace and end the riots and bullshit.

[iNcog]

-- deleted post --

[Cometk]

Idk dude, trying to explain poverty as endemic to a particular race because they are genetically inferior is so daft that it really doesn’t have a place on this site

[chris1089]

Show hidden quotes

Free speech is all good but comes with the caveat that we shouldnt allow hate on the boards. it's a fairly simple line that I dont see too much issue drawing

Do you have two conflicting definitions of free for different situations?

it's free speech for me to personally attack people on the forum and call them derogatory names, is that okay?

If that's what you call hate, do you have two conflicting definitions of hate that you use for different situations?

No, I think attacking an individual or a group of individuals is the same thing.

How is that in any way relevant to what I said?

[chris1089]

Idk dude, trying to explain poverty as endemic to a particular race because they are genetically inferior is so daft that it really doesn’t have a place on this site

Make it look daft then by putting holes through the argument and showing how it is leaky.

[n0el]

Show hidden quotes

Free speech is all good but comes with the caveat that we shouldnt allow hate on the boards. it's a fairly simple line that I dont see too much issue drawing

Do you have two conflicting definitions of free for different situations?

it's free speech for me to personally attack people on the forum and call them derogatory names, is that okay?

If that's what you call hate, do you have two conflicting definitions of hate that you use for different situations?

No, I think attacking an individual or a group of individuals is the same thing.

How is that in any way relevant to what I said?

I don't, maybe i misinterpreted you. I thought you were saying that a different definition was applicable to groups of people or individuals.

[chris1089]

Show hidden quotes

Free speech is all good but comes with the caveat that we shouldnt allow hate on the boards. it's a fairly simple line that I dont see too much issue drawing

Do you have two conflicting definitions of free for different situations?

it's free speech for me to personally attack people on the forum and call them derogatory names, is that okay?

If that's what you call hate, do you have two conflicting definitions of hate that you use for different situations?

No, I think attacking an individual or a group of individuals is the same thing.

How is that in any way relevant to what I said?

I don't, maybe i misinterpreted you. I thought you were saying that a different definition was applicable to groups of people or individuals.

No, you misunderstood. It's ok :p

[iNcog]

-- deleted post --