Why do you want to censor me? Just debate my posts insteadRiotcoke wrote:Best case scenario - Reinstate @Goodspeed but don't interfere in the slightest with how he's running off-topic, remove junk posts (I.e Ear), unban dolan.
US riots
- fightinfrenchman
- Ninja
- Posts: 23506
- Joined: Oct 17, 2015
- Location: Pennsylvania
Re: US riots
Dromedary Scone Mix is not Alone Mix
Re: US riots
Goodspeed wasn’t removed from his position, he resigned
Re: US riots
Is Dolan actually banned?Riotcoke wrote:Best case scenario - Reinstate @Goodspeed but don't interfere in the slightest with how he's running off-topic, remove junk posts (I.e Ear), unban dolan.
- Riotcoke
- Retired Contributor
- Posts: 4088
- Joined: May 7, 2019
- ESO: Riotcoke
- Location: Dorsetshire
- Clan: UwU
Re: US riots
I don't use the political threads, you post in my threads about a possible EU lan with absolute shit, so yes i should censor you.fightinfrenchman wrote:Why do you want to censor me? Just debate my posts insteadRiotcoke wrote:Best case scenario - Reinstate @Goodspeed but don't interfere in the slightest with how he's running off-topic, remove junk posts (I.e Ear), unban dolan.
twitch.tv/stangoesdeepTV
- Riotcoke
- Retired Contributor
- Posts: 4088
- Joined: May 7, 2019
- ESO: Riotcoke
- Location: Dorsetshire
- Clan: UwU
Re: US riots
Yes Noel banned him.Goodspeed wrote:Is Dolan actually banned?Riotcoke wrote:Best case scenario - Reinstate @Goodspeed but don't interfere in the slightest with how he's running off-topic, remove junk posts (I.e Ear), unban dolan.
twitch.tv/stangoesdeepTV
- Sargsyan
- Jaeger
- Posts: 3372
- Joined: Dec 18, 2017
- ESO: lamergamer
- Location: North Macedonia
- Clan: c0ns
Re: US riots
Dolan is banned
krichk wrote:For some reason, you want the world to know that you're brave enough to challenge Challenger_Marco
- Riotcoke
- Retired Contributor
- Posts: 4088
- Joined: May 7, 2019
- ESO: Riotcoke
- Location: Dorsetshire
- Clan: UwU
Re: US riots
He resigned as people were interfering with his moderation, simple as it should just be kept to mart.Cometk wrote:Goodspeed wasn’t removed from his position, he resigned
twitch.tv/stangoesdeepTV
- edeholland
- ESOC Community Team
- Posts: 5033
- Joined: Feb 11, 2015
- ESO: edeholland
- GameRanger ID: 4053888
- Clan: ESOC
Re: US riots
That would be best, but it has been proven hard to enforce.Riotcoke wrote:Best case scenario - Reinstate @Goodspeed but don't interfere in the slightest with how he's running off-topic
Re: US riots
it feels like pecelot-hleung era already
Re: US riots
-- deleted post --
Reason: on request (off-topic bulk delete)
Re: US riots
it has always been exactly that xDRiotcoke wrote:This thread has turned into cry babies who don't like their opinion being disputed.
as long as @fightinfrenchman isn't the one to define "hate speech", coz for some reason he is not able to google the definition of words....iNcog wrote:Free speech is all good but comes with the caveat that we shouldnt allow hate on the boards. it's a fairly simple line that I dont see too much issue drawing
- princeofcarthage
- Retired Contributor
- Posts: 8861
- Joined: Aug 28, 2015
- Location: Milky Way!
Re: US riots
Good point but 99% posts aren't hate. Most hate posts gets deleted anyways.iNcog wrote:Free speech is all good but comes with the caveat that we shouldnt allow hate on the boards. it's a fairly simple line that I dont see too much issue drawing
Fine line to something great is a strange change.
Re: US riots
Do you have two conflicting definitions of free for different situations?iNcog wrote:Free speech is all good but comes with the caveat that we shouldnt allow hate on the boards. it's a fairly simple line that I dont see too much issue drawing
Re: US riots
it's free speech for me to personally attack people on the forum and call them derogatory names, is that okay?chris1089 wrote:Do you have two conflicting definitions of free for different situations?iNcog wrote:Free speech is all good but comes with the caveat that we shouldnt allow hate on the boards. it's a fairly simple line that I dont see too much issue drawing
mad cuz bad
Re: US riots
If that's what you call hate, do you have two conflicting definitions of hate that you use for different situations?n0el wrote:it's free speech for me to personally attack people on the forum and call them derogatory names, is that okay?chris1089 wrote:Do you have two conflicting definitions of free for different situations?iNcog wrote:Free speech is all good but comes with the caveat that we shouldnt allow hate on the boards. it's a fairly simple line that I dont see too much issue drawing
Re: US riots
No, I think attacking an individual or a group of individuals is the same thing.chris1089 wrote:If that's what you call hate, do you have two conflicting definitions of hate that you use for different situations?n0el wrote:it's free speech for me to personally attack people on the forum and call them derogatory names, is that okay?Show hidden quotes
mad cuz bad
Re: US riots
n0el wrote: it's free speech for me to personally attack people on the forum and call them derogatory names, is that okay?
ehm, does calling ppl racist when it obvsly does not apply count?n0el wrote:No, I think attacking an individual or a group of individuals is the same thing.
Re: US riots
Biden will most likely get elected and then hopefully this bullshit will end.
Trump is not the man for this type of a job obviously to restore peace and end the riots and bullshit.
Trump is not the man for this type of a job obviously to restore peace and end the riots and bullshit.
Re: US riots
-- deleted post --
Reason: on request (off-topic bulk delete)
Re: US riots
Idk dude, trying to explain poverty as endemic to a particular race because they are genetically inferior is so daft that it really doesn’t have a place on this site
Re: US riots
How is that in any way relevant to what I said?n0el wrote:No, I think attacking an individual or a group of individuals is the same thing.chris1089 wrote:If that's what you call hate, do you have two conflicting definitions of hate that you use for different situations?Show hidden quotes
Re: US riots
Make it look daft then by putting holes through the argument and showing how it is leaky.Cometk wrote:Idk dude, trying to explain poverty as endemic to a particular race because they are genetically inferior is so daft that it really doesn’t have a place on this site
Re: US riots
I don't, maybe i misinterpreted you. I thought you were saying that a different definition was applicable to groups of people or individuals.chris1089 wrote:How is that in any way relevant to what I said?n0el wrote:No, I think attacking an individual or a group of individuals is the same thing.Show hidden quotes
mad cuz bad
Re: US riots
No, you misunderstood. It's ok :pn0el wrote:I don't, maybe i misinterpreted you. I thought you were saying that a different definition was applicable to groups of people or individuals.chris1089 wrote:How is that in any way relevant to what I said?Show hidden quotes
Re: US riots
-- deleted post --
Reason: on request (off-topic bulk delete)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests