fightinfrenchman wrote:People got mad about it but this ad is legitimately funny
that's some bad taste there.
Psychopathic really
fightinfrenchman wrote:People got mad about it but this ad is legitimately funny
Weirdly enough one of holosprays is reported to have said "Gibraltar's got you!" What do you think that may have meant?howlingwolfpaw wrote:Curious..... I am not sure how this tech really works so whether or not it could project out of the building or was part of an external technology system linked to it or not.evilcheadar wrote:It’s basically a sort of signaling beacon type thing from what I understandShow hidden quotes
Perhaps it was a beacon to a drone like object that could project a hologram of a plane around it, and then used that signal to attack that specific spot they needed for the rest of the illusion. (though quite real I'm afraid)
Ah you are right I forgot there is no force if velocity equals zero that's my mistake.fightinfrenchman wrote:I don't see why having 500,000 tons of material above something would exert any pressure on itSensei wrote:Gravity can create quite a bit of force on a steel structure. The twin towers for instance weighed 500,000 tons each.
This is BS political correctness. It's a funny adhowlingwolfpaw wrote: that's some bad taste there.
Psychopathic really
princeofcarthage wrote:Fuck off @Sensei
that is what i mean, it's a very serious task to get a big enough amount of powerful enough explosives in an organized way, and then detonate them properly all without getting stopped. seems like hijacking planes would be easier.princeofcarthage wrote:Not supporting any conspiracy theory or anything but terrorists had managed to bomb the basement in 1990s. The plan was same to destroy the centres. But it failed. Well bomb exploded but towers didn't collapse.harcha wrote:@howlingwolfpaw you realize that planting and successfully detonating explosives this powerful is much harder than just flying the actual planes right?
POC wrote:Also I most likely know a whole lot more than you.
POC wrote:Also as an objective third party, and near 100% accuracy of giving correct information, I would say my opinions are more reliable than yours.
I dislike your dislike.Sensei wrote:princeofcarthage wrote:Fuck off @Sensei
Like you said it is obvious that Terrorists didn't demo the buildings with explosives it was the US government that way they had a reason to go to war in the Middle East and they had the public's support.harcha wrote:that is what i mean, it's a very serious task to get a big enough amount of powerful enough explosives in an organized way, and then detonate them properly all without getting stopped. seems like hijacking planes would be easier.princeofcarthage wrote:Not supporting any conspiracy theory or anything but terrorists had managed to bomb the basement in 1990s. The plan was same to destroy the centres. But it failed. Well bomb exploded but towers didn't collapse.harcha wrote:@howlingwolfpaw you realize that planting and successfully detonating explosives this powerful is much harder than just flying the actual planes right?
It is really inefficient the get the steel the same temperature as the fire. the fire needs to be way hotter than the metal, just too much heat dissipation, and really besides the fireball where are the major fires? the whole top half of building should have been engulfed in flames by that time if it were all that flammable. All we see is smoke and like paper office stuff on fire.Sensei wrote:princeofcarthage wrote:Actually I don't know where you are getting your info from but steel loses 50% of its strength at ~1200 deg f and jet fuel burns at ~1500 deg f. So while steel itself would not break it would lose enough strength to not sustain the weight.
princeofcarthage wrote:I dislike your dislike.Sensei wrote:princeofcarthage wrote:Fuck off @Sensei
every year buildings around the world collapse due to variety of reasons, some under their own weighthowlingwolfpaw wrote:voigt1240 wrote:Interested to hear your take on What you think of tower 7
Do you reckon it was a controlled demolition that led to its collapse or do you think building 7 was hit by lots of debris from the towers and the fire weakened it structurally which made it collapse.
i have always heard 9/11 conspiracy theorists talking about tower 7.
@howlingwolfpaw
I see no reason a building should fall like this. Clearly another act only concealed by peoples disillusionment that a criminal group would never try to infiltrate the gov't for their own agendas
There are many.
POC wrote:Also I most likely know a whole lot more than you.
POC wrote:Also as an objective third party, and near 100% accuracy of giving correct information, I would say my opinions are more reliable than yours.
fightinfrenchman wrote:This is BS political correctness. It's a funny adhowlingwolfpaw wrote: that's some bad taste there.
Psychopathic really
Okay so you are okay with demanding political correctness. Seems like a way to control people tbhhowlingwolfpaw wrote:fightinfrenchman wrote:This is BS political correctness. It's a funny adhowlingwolfpaw wrote: that's some bad taste there.
Psychopathic really
some things you just have a respect for.
So you're cancelling themhowlingwolfpaw wrote: but I would not be enticed to want to buy from that company
harcha wrote:every year buildings around the world collapse due to variety of reasons, some under their own weighthowlingwolfpaw wrote:voigt1240 wrote:Interested to hear your take on What you think of tower 7
Do you reckon it was a controlled demolition that led to its collapse or do you think building 7 was hit by lots of debris from the towers and the fire weakened it structurally which made it collapse.
i have always heard 9/11 conspiracy theorists talking about tower 7.
@howlingwolfpaw
I see no reason a building should fall like this. Clearly another act only concealed by peoples disillusionment that a criminal group would never try to infiltrate the gov't for their own agendas
There are many.
fightinfrenchman wrote:So you're cancelling themhowlingwolfpaw wrote: but I would not be enticed to want to buy from that company
Oh hey got lost in the feed.fightinfrenchman wrote:@howlingwolfpaw You never answered my question about the mysterious Gibraltar message
Seems a bit absurd to act like it wasn't related to the buildings coming down, the guy specifically said he hadn't ever seen holosprays in the staircases beforehowlingwolfpaw wrote:Oh hey got lost in the feed.fightinfrenchman wrote:@howlingwolfpaw You never answered my question about the mysterious Gibraltar message
I had to look up some info on Gibraltar, interesting to see a UK colony in Spain held contentiously in the past but voted to remain under UK,
You can also marry anyone there with a days notice and will get legal recognition worldwide, and host barbary ape populations.
It is a strategic location with lots of significant history (including military) so could be an inside nod to some event
Other than that I have no idea what it would mean
Seems like a bit of a red herring.
Can you provide a source for this, maybe a yield strength vs. temperature graph of steel like this [1]. Or the stress/strain graphs of steel at different temperatures [2]. Steel as a meterial is equally strong in tension as it is in compression (but compression is susceptible to buckling).howlingwolfpaw wrote:Also, steel even while hot still retains most of its compression strength
I'm just assuming this is in reference to a very popular video:howlingwolfpaw wrote:Even hot, steel retains most of its compression strength, a long piece can be bent fairly easily
The poem is actually far older than the 1500s. This is unfortunately a common misconception. The original poem was written several thousand years ago - exactly when is unclear, with contemporary scholars estimating as few as 6,000 years to as many as 100,000. Unhelpful, I know. Most of the original poem has fallen out of public memory, although a group at Pembroke (part of Oxford) was able to recover it and produce a faithful translation in 1954. The academic consensus, however, is that it is of little significance, likely written by a retired burglar who had taken up amateur poetry after a particularly big heist and enjoyed writing ridiculous songs to entertain his nieces and nephews.howlingwolfpaw wrote:I am sure most of you have heard of the old nursury rhythm "hey diddle diddle" this is what I think it means:
original was
High Diddle Diddle
the cat and the fiddle
the cow jumps over the moon
the little dog laughs to see such a craft
and the fork runs away with the spoon
changed to (not sure when)
Hi diddle diddle
the cat and the fiddle
the cow jumps over the moon
the little dog laughs to see such a sport
and the dish runs away with the spoon.
. Interesting that the poem was made in 1765 or as early as 1500's, but then revised at some point. Hi (or original was high) diddle diddle (diddle= has a couple applicable definitions, possible fraud or aimless productiveness) the cat n the fiddle (represents a common hotel name from medieval times) the cow ( cows are like calling people sheep in older times ) jumps over the moon.... (trying to get to the moon space race) the little dog (dogs are like watchers, sheep herders) laughs, to see such a sport ( the trying to get to the moon, or space race) (original text in 1700's was craft, so maybe then people just wanted to try to build ships) and the dish (original was fork) ran away with the spoon, symbolizing the idea of a plane and dome left the zeitgeist of the people. !!!!!!
Historical context in present narrative:
Is that when the realm decided it was a ball earth I am sure many people were talking about dreaming to go to the moon. Or maybe it was even changed later to really adapt it more to the space race.
I just got 2 new videos to review about Warner Von Braun and the moon someone recommended to me last night so will see if they add anything to this later... to much to do today.... Merry Christmas.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests
Which top 10 players do you wish to see listed?
Which streams do you wish to see listed?