Open season on CEOs (question)
Re: Open season on CEOs (question)
I know, that CEO denied so many people health care with an AI at 90% failure rate! He killed so many? Why would he do such a thing?
Re: Open season on CEOs (question)
Allegedly. 2 minutes on Google and you would have realized the source for that claim is a lawsuit.
https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/united ... e-denials/
Being in a lawsuit doesn't make it true.
Irregardless I think anyone with basic critical thinking skills can understand why killing someone vigilante style is bad.
https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/united ... e-denials/
Being in a lawsuit doesn't make it true.
Irregardless I think anyone with basic critical thinking skills can understand why killing someone vigilante style is bad.
Re: Open season on CEOs (question)
Hm, I'd never really thought about irregardless and regardless meaning basically the same thing.
Re: Open season on CEOs (question)
not all US citizens have the privilege of killing people legally though (e.g. US cops or whichever fucks get off on denying people life saving treatments). cynically, the vigilantes have a smaller body count
the system offers absolutely no legal recourse whatsoever to the folks getting killed by the system. this outcome, though "bad", is hardly surprising. then again it isn't like americans are very good at history
Re: Open season on CEOs (question)
to be clear, violence shouldn't be encouraged. and I'm not condoning it. though lol anyone with basic critical thinking skills can understand the motivations of the attacker here.
Re: Open season on CEOs (question)
https://x.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/1864741196259823643
the "anti-elite" asking the plebs to defend the elite
-
- Gendarme
- Posts: 6066
- Joined: Jun 4, 2019
Re: Open season on CEOs (question)
Would killing hitler vigilante style have been bad?gibson wrote: ↑05 Dec 2024, 16:20Allegedly. 2 minutes on Google and you would have realized the source for that claim is a lawsuit.
https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/united ... e-denials/
Being in a lawsuit doesn't make it true.
Irregardless I think anyone with basic critical thinking skills can understand why killing someone vigilante style is bad.
Re: Open season on CEOs (question)
Are you killing him before or after he started mass murdering?
Re: Open season on CEOs (question)
Can we do Musk next?
-
- Gendarme
- Posts: 6066
- Joined: Jun 4, 2019
Re: Open season on CEOs (question)
I'd say, look at it in a bigger picture sense. Knowing what we know now (and ignoring crazy alt history stuff), I think most people would agree that killing Hitler would have been morally just.
Which means that there is a degree of evilness where society believes murder is justified. It seems like some people believe this CEO was evil beyond the cutoff point, justifying his murder.
Re: Open season on CEOs (question)
For me it actually depends on when you do it. If you kill him as a baby that's morally wrong even if you know he eventually turns out to be a mass murderer.RefluxSemantic wrote: ↑06 Dec 2024, 09:38I'd say, look at it in a bigger picture sense. Knowing what we know now (and ignoring crazy alt history stuff), I think most people would agree that killing Hitler would have been morally just.
Imagine a society where we can know at birth who turns out to be a criminal. Would it be morally just to lock up the eventual criminals before they do any harm? I think it would be practically the right thing to do for society as a whole, but it's still a moral injustice towards them.
- harcha
- Gendarme
- Posts: 5246
- Joined: Jul 2, 2015
- ESO: hatamoto_samurai
Re: Open season on CEOs (question)
True. At the same time when people get into power and cause mass murder or other major harm to society in a systematic way it is somewhat ambiguous at which point specifically they became responsible.
POC wrote:Also I most likely know a whole lot more than you.
POC wrote:Also as an objective third party, and near 100% accuracy of giving correct information, I would say my opinions are more reliable than yours.
Re: Open season on CEOs (question)
Imo they become responsible when they actually do the wrong thing. Holding people responsible in the present for their future actions is problematic
Re: Open season on CEOs (question)
there was plenty of justification of killing hitler prior to him doing genocide, I think. he took years to ramp up
Re: Open season on CEOs (question)
when will americans realize they're just dirt underneath the shoes of the wealthyDolan wrote: ↑06 Dec 2024, 04:48
https://x.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/1864741196259823643
the "anti-elite" asking the plebs to defend the elite
Re: Open season on CEOs (question)
- harcha
- Gendarme
- Posts: 5246
- Joined: Jul 2, 2015
- ESO: hatamoto_samurai
Re: Open season on CEOs (question)
What would in this case be the wrong thing? He was literally hired to bring profits for the corporation. Should he be held responsible the moment he accepts the CEO position?
It's easy for them to just not look into the negative consequences of their "increasing value/profits" activities. It's easy to work in a corporation and just not look into these things
POC wrote:Also I most likely know a whole lot more than you.
POC wrote:Also as an objective third party, and near 100% accuracy of giving correct information, I would say my opinions are more reliable than yours.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests