ESOC Patch is coming
Posted: 23 Oct 2015, 18:08
Are there any plans to include the building rotator in the patch? Thatd be a nice change to negate rotational imbalances, is easy and improves gameplay overall imo.
The most active Age of Empires III community: hosting seasonal tournaments, live streams, replays, expert strategy, and fan-made content.
https://eso-community.net/
That''s exactly why you''re not working on the fanpatch project.subzero wrote:Okay. That''s what I would love to see in Spain-
1)10 xbow or 8 skirm age up/6 huss age up
2)Free veteran upgrade for Rodeleros.
3)Give lancer 4x vs infantry as their original multiplier, and remove the card which does the same.
4)10 Rods and 9 Rods instead of 8 rods and 7 rods. Also give them 7 rods instead of 6 in age 2.
5)11 highlanders instead of 9.
6)+1 wood crate.
7)Free gangsaw and great coats.
I asked but they don''t want tojerom wrote:Are there any plans to include the building rotator in the patch? Thatd be a nice change to negate rotational imbalances, is easy and improves gameplay overall imo.
Why not? I cant think of many arguments to not do it tbh.diarouga wrote:I asked but they dont want tojerom wrote:Are there any plans to include the building rotator in the patch? Thatd be a nice change to negate rotational imbalances, is easy and improves gameplay overall imo.
Are u kidding me? u only have 1 shipment more than other civs, is ridicolous if u compared whit 20 extras british vills from houses and if u send 5v first u are going to early GG XDforgrin wrote:Spain eco is pretty good if you convert those extra shipments into eco advantages and dont waste them on units. Eg you can ship 5v just about every game quite easily.88baronrojo88 wrote:lol everyone talking about shipments , is right spain shipments and politicians options are mediocre especially in 3th age , but ... SPAIN NEED MORE ECO , SPAIN ECO IS RIDICOLOUS . not you agree with me? this is evident for example in team games.
"I dont think rotation has a place in the game personallyjerom wrote:Why not? I cant think of many arguments to not do it tbh.diarouga wrote:I asked but they dont want to
diarouga wrote:"I dont think rotation has a place in the game personallyjerom wrote:Why not? I cant think of many arguments to not do it tbh.
its a bit controversial honestly"
?samwise12 wrote:?
I 100% agree with you, thats why I asked but thats not goona happen sadly.jerom wrote:those are indeed great arguments...diarouga wrote:"I dont think rotation has a place in the game personally
its a bit controversial honestly"
Reality is that people will likely be using the mod anyways, and rather than fighting it you might aswell embrace it. Im not sure it is possible to convince me that it will make the game worse.
gg wpdiarouga wrote:Yeah gg wp, you killed age3 by not realeasing the fp in time.
The fp will be released once the fp team has enough practice with it before anyone else.diarouga wrote:Yeah gg wp, you killed age3 by not realeasing the fp in time.
What a piece of shit!calmyourtits wrote: :coffee:
Something Id like personally is for the secondary ("higher tier") 4 Lancer shipment to become a "Spanish Counter Infantry Regiment" shipment of 3 Lancers and 3 Skirmishers.bramboy wrote:You have to keep the design which ES did when they first made the civs in mind. Spain is designed to have no ranged infantry shipments. If you would give them 8 skirm they would just become another France and lose their originality.hazza54321 wrote: i think they need an 8 skirm shipment 1kg and just better shipments overall, 3 lancers, 6 rods lol
Good shipments is not the Spanish civilization bonus.hazza54321 wrote:true, but they definitely need better shipments considering its their civ bonusbramboy wrote:You have to keep the design which ES did when they first made the civs in mind. Spain is designed to have no ranged infantry shipments. If you would give them 8 skirm they would just become another France and lose their originality.
One argument is that it is disallowed in tournaments. Its a pragmatic one, sure, but nevertheless reasonable given the circumstances.jerom wrote:Why not? I cant think of many arguments to not do it tbh.diarouga wrote:I asked but they dont want to