ESOCommunity

Hmm I need more votes

I like how 50% of tr community plays andes rest 25% ori and 20% deccan but still most voted map is northern california xD

Feels like treaty needs more map diversity

if every map had inca maybe people would play more than andes, its a hard call between map itself and nat's, I think I will go with 60 nats and 40 map itself

Maybe TP should buff minor nats

I think I kind of loathe ESOC Andes at this point.

dicktator_ wrote:I think I kind of loathe ESOC Andes at this point.

Whats the reason?

Well generated RE andes map is far better than esoc andes

Gichtenlord wrote:Well generated RE andes map is far better than esoc andes

I also agree with this, got pretty tired of ESOC andes cos it was the same thing over and over again. I wonder who the map maker was.

Rikki, but it was charlemagen and dicktator who designed the map. It's not a bad map. It's actually a compromise of having a solid map every single time, but it will also never have the same potential as re andes has.

Completely agree, i feel like esoc andes you are always gonna play the same way unless MUs are different. On re andes every game was different since map was random. Even though the possibility of being hunt screwed is higher the fact it wasn't repetitive kinda made up for it.

Yeah, ESOC Andes is good as a tournament map (where balance is a priority) but for casual games I’d almost refer RE Andes. Reason I say almost is because RE Andes could screw quite hard with cliffs and tc position. A version of Andes that is both balanced and randomized would be ideal and far better than what we have currently.

one that isnt made by gichtenlord

I'd trust Gichtenlord way more to make a treaty map than Riki