AOEisLOVE_AOEisLIFE wrote:removing any possible random event like a good treasure that gives an advantage for one player doesnt seem like a way to make this game more fun, but idc anyway. is there any tournament stream/video/replay where a native warrior actually prevented a FB ? i would like to watch that..
The problem with competitive gaming is that it values balance over entertainment. Anything that disrupts a cookie cutter build is "broken" and needs to be removed. I would not be at all surprised to see this change get implemented, or for treasures to be removed all together. Who cares if the game is boring and the meta is stale as long as everything is "balanced"?
well, balance is mostly reducing the effect of random features and the odds being stacked into one's favor due to unfair advantages. Games where such balance doesn't exist, may indeed be very fun. But in that sense, entertainment and competitiveness are mutually exclusive. That's why we have world championships in chess, but not in monopoly. although you can easily argue that the latter is by far more entertaining. if you can be entertained by the creativity and wits people use to best each other on a level playing field, then there is no reason to think that more balance equals less entertainment.
ZumZum says: Non-white people are inferior beings as they feel less than white people, such as himself. Thus, other rape victims suffer less trauma than white people. NeoNazioom thinks rape is bad when you rape white people, less bad if they aren't.