ESOC "standard" map set
-
- Pro Player
- Posts: 10282
- Joined: Jun 6, 2015
- Location: Paris
- GameRanger ID: 5529322
ESOC "standard" map set
Can we fix this map set please? We literally get 50% of no tp maps, or other kind of non standard maps like baja or klondike. I don't mind no tp maps, but at some point it gets boring, especially since the game isn't balanced around them. And it's totally not standard so it makes no sense.
LoOk_tOm wrote:I have something in particular against Kaisar (GERMANY NOOB mercenary LAMME FOREVER) And the other people (noobs) like suck kaiser ... just this ..
-
- Pro Player
- Posts: 8050
- Joined: May 4, 2015
- ESO: PrinceofBabu
Re: ESOC "standard" map set
whats in the map pool, wheres the full set?
- [Armag] diarouga
- Ninja
- Posts: 12710
- Joined: Feb 26, 2015
- ESO: diarouga
- Location: France
Re: ESOC "standard" map set
@n0el Still can't read the wiki, could you fix that? I'm sure it isn't that hard.
Re: ESOC "standard" map set
I saw some people talking about making a rated mapset with only current tourney map. I think it could be a good idea
- [Armag] diarouga
- Ninja
- Posts: 12710
- Joined: Feb 26, 2015
- ESO: diarouga
- Location: France
Re: ESOC "standard" map set
bwinner1 wrote:I saw some people talking about making a rated mapset with only current tourney map. I think it could be a good idea
Too bad some people fought to have Deccan instead of Hudson Bay :(
-
- Pro Player
- Posts: 8050
- Joined: May 4, 2015
- ESO: PrinceofBabu
Re: ESOC "standard" map set
hudson bay is boring
-
- Pro Player
- Posts: 8050
- Joined: May 4, 2015
- ESO: PrinceofBabu
Re: ESOC "standard" map set
especially if its the only map you play on
- [Armag] diarouga
- Ninja
- Posts: 12710
- Joined: Feb 26, 2015
- ESO: diarouga
- Location: France
Re: ESOC "standard" map set
Hazza54321 wrote:hudson bay is boring
It's the most balanced map however.
-
- Pro Player
- Posts: 8050
- Joined: May 4, 2015
- ESO: PrinceofBabu
Re: ESOC "standard" map set
with retarded treasures i doubt it
- [Armag] diarouga
- Ninja
- Posts: 12710
- Joined: Feb 26, 2015
- ESO: diarouga
- Location: France
Re: ESOC "standard" map set
Hazza54321 wrote:with retarded treasures i doubt it
Most of the time the treasures are balanced, and both players get good treasures.
Re: ESOC "standard" map set
[Armag] diarouga wrote:@n0el Still can't read the wiki, could you fix that? I'm sure it isn't that hard.
@edeholland
mad cuz bad
- Makrokosmos12
- Skirmisher
- Posts: 199
- Joined: Aug 17, 2016
- ESO: Templer12
Re: ESOC "standard" map set
If you play no TP civs apparently.
-
- Ninja
- Posts: 13004
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
Re: ESOC "standard" map set
Kaiserklein wrote:Can we fix this map set please? We literally get 50% of no tp maps, or other kind of non standard maps like baja or klondike. I don't mind no tp maps, but at some point it gets boring, especially since the game isn't balanced around them. And it's totally not standard so it makes no sense.
Stop. Crying.
Re: ESOC "standard" map set
Good topic! I'll look into player opinion on this, and react accordingly.
Indeed. Some (myself included) have been wanting to implement this for a long time – along with a few other logical and popular map-sets. Unfortunately, a minority of people cannot tolerate others enjoying such a feature, and it was scrapped. At least we got some improvements, in return.bwinner1 wrote:I saw some people talking about making a rated mapset with only current tourney map. I think it could be a good idea
- Sargsyan
- Jaeger
- Posts: 3372
- Joined: Dec 18, 2017
- ESO: lamergamer
- Location: North Macedonia
- Clan: c0ns
Re: ESOC "standard" map set
Yeah you often get either no tp maps or high tp maps like high plains or klondike, set is not completely fine Garja cmon bruh
krichk wrote:For some reason, you want the world to know that you're brave enough to challenge Challenger_Marco
Re: ESOC "standard" map set
To get less zero tp maps in games with map set "standard maps".
Re: ESOC "standard" map set
No tp maps are good. And it is 6 out of 22. Even adding 3-4 non popular maps (mostly because crybases) its' 1/3 at most.
Anyway there is another thread for map report issues.
Anyway there is another thread for map report issues.
-
- Ninja
- Posts: 14364
- Joined: Mar 26, 2015
Re: ESOC "standard" map set
Make map sets with every possible combination of maps
Re: ESOC "standard" map set
Garja wrote:No tp maps are good. And it is 6 out of 22. Even adding 3-4 non popular maps (mostly because crybases) its' 1/3 at most.
Anyway there is another thread for map report issues.
They are good, but are they standard ?
Re: ESOC "standard" map set
Yes they are. There is more standard play on Gran Chaco or even Cascade Range than most TPs maps where colonial is often skipped and it's mostly about clickin on shipments.
-
- Pro Player
- Posts: 10282
- Joined: Jun 6, 2015
- Location: Paris
- GameRanger ID: 5529322
Re: ESOC "standard" map set
A standard map is a map where all civs are roughly as strong. No tp maps aren't standard, they favour a few civs. EP wasn't balanced around no tp maps. The same goes for maps with 5 tps, or heavy water maps.
Obviously we can't just keep super standard maps, cause it would be too few of them. But for example, maps like cascade range, klondike, or alaska, are really not standard at all. I don't mind non standard maps, but the set is called "standard maps".
What about this set instead:
[spoiler=spoiler]ESOC Adirondacks
ESOC Arizona
ESOC Arkansas
ESOC Baja California
ESOC Bengal
ESOC Colorado
ESOC Florida
ESOC Fertile Crescent
ESOC Gran Chaco
ESOC Great Basin
ESOC High plains
ESOC Herald Island
ESOC Hudson Bay
ESOC Jebel Musa
ESOC Kamchatka
ESOC Manchac
ESOC Manchuria
ESOC Malaysia
ESOC Mendocino
ESOC Pampas Sierras
ESOC Tassili
Could arguably remove Baja because it's large/low food/big water and high plains because of 5 tps[/spoiler]
Obviously we can't just keep super standard maps, cause it would be too few of them. But for example, maps like cascade range, klondike, or alaska, are really not standard at all. I don't mind non standard maps, but the set is called "standard maps".
What about this set instead:
[spoiler=spoiler]ESOC Adirondacks
ESOC Arizona
ESOC Arkansas
ESOC Baja California
ESOC Bengal
ESOC Colorado
ESOC Florida
ESOC Fertile Crescent
ESOC Gran Chaco
ESOC Great Basin
ESOC High plains
ESOC Herald Island
ESOC Hudson Bay
ESOC Jebel Musa
ESOC Kamchatka
ESOC Manchac
ESOC Manchuria
ESOC Malaysia
ESOC Mendocino
ESOC Pampas Sierras
ESOC Tassili
Could arguably remove Baja because it's large/low food/big water and high plains because of 5 tps[/spoiler]
LoOk_tOm wrote:I have something in particular against Kaisar (GERMANY NOOB mercenary LAMME FOREVER) And the other people (noobs) like suck kaiser ... just this ..
Re: ESOC "standard" map set
Although I do not dislike the current one, this "standard set" seems fine too
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests