Aggressive Policy Card balance questioning

[Tobyres]

I have a question about the changed sioux card:

“Aggressive Policy” shipment now increases Teepee gather-rate aura from 3% to 5% (instead of enabling War Hut units to construct Teepees)

I don't understand the meaning of the words standing in the brackets. There it stands that Aggressive Policy only enabled war hut units to construct teepees, which isn't true. They were able to construct stables and war huts too.

So my question is, if it's just not mentioned there, or if it's an intentional balance to remove that ability. In my opinion it's not game changing at all (correct me if I'm wrong) and I kind of miss the ability to build stables and war huts with war hut units.

Would be awesome to get that ability back in case it wasn't meant as balance.

[I_HaRRiiSoN_I]

In RE patch, this enables infantry to construct military buildings and teepees.

In EP Patch this effect is already given to the infantry permanently as a kind of buff. This card was changed to buff the eco benefits of the teepees in the EP patch if you wanted to send it.

[edeholland]

Yep, check out the patch notes of EP 3.x: https://wiki.eso-community.net/ESOC_Pat ... /3.x#Sioux.

War Clubs’, Cetan Bows’ and Wakina Rifles’ ability to build Teepees by default added.

It seems like that change isn't correctly represented in the combined change log.

[Hazza54321]

Another fake tabias

[Aizamk]

The question is mainly about being able to build war huts and stables, though. I believe that feature is now completely inaccessible with or without cards (someone correct me if I am wrong)

[Hazza54321]

EITher way all teepee cards are shite

[Tobyres]

Thanks for the respond

@edeholland Is there any way to get the ability to build stables and war huts within this card back in the esoc patch or would the card be considered to much then? It just doesn't feel right to remove this ability from the card.

And as @Hazza54321 mentioned the teepee cards aren't good and you wouldn't send them in a competitive game anyway I guess.