What would you change of this TIER LIST?

[NekoBerk]

So me and a friend did this Tier List really well arranged even by order.

So for example Iros and Ottos would be better than Incas, Brits and the remaining civs and by this logic Sweden would kick everyone's ass (In our opinion ofc). I know in november there was a thread talking about tier lists too but i find this subject fascinating and maybe your perspective is different than the last time so i'd be glad and feel honored to know your opinions and reasons




Da TIER LIST

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

[lemmings121]

seems reasonable imo. I would just put japan also on tier A, and change both lakota and aztec to C.

[look]

japan tier S+
everything.

[gibson]

Sweden is not the best civ( in 1v1)

[Rohbrot]

S tier ; japan, sweden and otto.
A tier ; iro ,port ,germany, brit, inca, spain, france and india
B tier; china, lakota , russia and dutch
C tier ; azzy

[Jotunir]

Sweden is not the best civ( in 1v1)

Poltava

[NekoBerk]

Sweden is not the best civ( in 1v1)

Which is better then ?

[[Armag] diarouga]

Talking about 1v1 on land TP maps :

Swe in not S tier at all. In fact, in 1v1 it's a mediocre civ, probably tier B.

A tier looks accurate (though I don't know how strong Inca is), but I'd split these civs between S and A tier.

[Garja]

A lot of things.

S tier:
Fre, Ports, Brits, Jap, India
A tier:
Swedes, Spain, Ger, Iro, Sioux, China, Inca, Aztecs, Otto, Dutch
B tier:
Russia

A tier can be split but there is so much counterciving that it's hard to draw the line

[Rohbrot]

A lot of things.

S tier:
Fre, Ports, Brits, Jap, India
A tier:
Swedes, Spain, Ger, Iro, Sioux, China, Inca, Aztecs, Otto, Dutch
B tier:
Russia

A tier can be split but there is so much counterciving that it's hard to draw the line

Azzy tier A ROFL

[Hazza54321]

None of these tiers look accurate to me but thats just my opinion

[Garja]

Azzies have good MU vs half of the civs in tier A

[kevinitalien]

for me

[Challenger_Marco]

https://tiermaker.com/create/aoe3-de-1v ... ist-223261
Use this to make your own & share

[[Armag] diarouga]

for me

lol

[NekoBerk]

None of these tiers look accurate to me but thats just my opinion

Show your list then haha don't hide it

[Hazza54321]

something like this

[Le Hussard sur le toit]

I think this thread would be more interesting if people gave the reason why they constructed their tier list this way...

[Kawapasaka]

No Inca because I have no idea and half its features need to be deleted/reworked regardless of balance. Maybe I'm overrating Iro a bit idk not much experience there but in my mind it's been top tier since forever. Overall balance isn't that bad I'd say.

[chronique]

Why lakota so low ranked :( i can't beat them.

[NekoBerk]

Why lakota so low ranked :( i can't beat them.

There you are my favorite Nemo fan how is your list?

[juhjuh]

something like this

why is germany so high? they feels super slow to me. They have a late age up with all those civs like france aging one vill earlyer, late 700c becouse of no tp age 1, sometimes you dont even have a shipment when doing an ff, no way you can ff with 700c anymore. Also you basically have only 2 bos like Germany is super predictable

[gibson]

something like this

This is the closest to being right in this thread(by a lot)

[chronique]

Why lakota so low ranked :( i can't beat them.

There you are my favorite Nemo fan how is your list?

It's hard because civ are very map dependent, port on water is S, swe depend a lot about if there are cliff / how many safe gold can you get, brit with hunt etc.... I think aztek is the worst (and the only unplayable civ) then china dutch, russia prob slithly better.

I think lakota is not S but i can't beat them.

[Rohbrot]

something like this

This is the closest to being right in this thread(by a lot)

Nerd