[Balance] Carbine Cavalry viability

General forum about Age of Empires 3 DE. Please post strategy threads, recorded games, user-created content and tech support threads in their respective forum.
User avatar
Slovenia Javon
Musketeer
Posts: 94
Joined: Mar 16, 2021

[Balance] Carbine Cavalry viability

Post by Javon »

Hello all,

I made some calculations in Excel to better gauge how strong or rather how weak Carbine Cavalry is for USA right now.
You can view it here:


Of course numbers don't tell every thing, but seeing as how general consensous right now is that Carbine Cav sucks and the metrics shown here are showing just that, I think they need to be buffed, atleast to bring up to par with Zamburak, which are already considered weak.
I suggest dropping the coin cost from 80 to 70, which would go a long way.

Feel free to comment how you would change it or tell which massive blunder I made by overlooking an important aspect.
Australia Hazza54321
Pro Player
Winter Champion 2020 x2Donator 01
Posts: 8050
Joined: May 4, 2015
ESO: PrinceofBabu

Re: [Balance] Carbine Cavalry viability

Post by Hazza54321 »

Zambs arent weak. However if you compare it with ruyters they do seem weak
User avatar
Korea South Miyawaki Sakura
Dragoon
Posts: 279
Joined: Jun 29, 2019
ESO: Ms.Takagi
Location: Seoul

Re: [Balance] Carbine Cavalry viability

Post by Miyawaki Sakura »

USA already has the strongest musk and streltsy, so the carbine Cavalry shouldn't be strong.
User avatar
Great Britain TheNameDaniel
Advanced Player
Donator 01
Posts: 727
Joined: Sep 13, 2016
ESO: danielek
Location: UK

Re: [Balance] Carbine Cavalry viability

Post by TheNameDaniel »

USA needs a cav upgrade cos rn no one makes a stable and its sad
User avatar
Slovenia Javon
Musketeer
Posts: 94
Joined: Mar 16, 2021

Re: [Balance] Carbine Cavalry viability

Post by Javon »

Alright I'd agree that Zambs aren't all that bad, considering they cost 1 population and are quite cheap.

Just because USA has strong musks and skirms, they shouldn't be forced to rely only on those units. Also I'd say the musks are debatable, as they are quite expensive. If state milita gets nerfed the civ could be left without any good units.
Vietnam duckzilla
Jaeger
Posts: 2497
Joined: Jun 26, 2016

Re: [Balance] Carbine Cavalry viability

Post by duckzilla »

TheNameDaniel wrote:USA needs a cav upgrade cos rn no one makes a stable and its sad
This so much. Similar to Swedes, there is just no reason to build a stable.
Whatever is written above: this is no financial advice.

Beati pauperes spiritu.
User avatar
Italy Garja
Retired Contributor
Donator 02
Posts: 9730
Joined: Feb 11, 2015
ESO: Garja

Re: [Balance] Carbine Cavalry viability

Post by Garja »

Hazza54321 wrote:Zambs arent weak. However if you compare it with ruyters they do seem weak
?
Ruyters have shit 10% rr, zambs 30%, they're pretty much equivalent, except for the royal guard up. Ruyters do cost less.
TheNameDaniel wrote:USA needs a cav upgrade cos rn no one makes a stable and its sad
USA have 10 consulate goon card and x2 8vet Apache card. You can send those cards while making pure militia and that's your skirm-goon composition. If you run thin on anticav then can add some carbine cavalry. Carbine cav do have a 25% attack upgrade in age4, which combined with the extra range and extra rate of fire make them a viable anticav dpser. Maybe they could benefit from the royal guard up.

For hand cav it is a bit different since there is only a uhlan card. In 1v1 tho that+regular huss should be enough, considering your other 2/3 of army are full upgradable and USA have gatlings as anti infantry anyway. Also there is a chance to get stradiots or hackapells at the saloon.
duckzilla wrote:
TheNameDaniel wrote:USA needs a cav upgrade cos rn no one makes a stable and its sad
This so much. Similar to Swedes, there is just no reason to build a stable.
Hakkapelit is a good unit, I'd say better than huss but I don't expect many to agree on that. For sure, sweden has enough cav ups.
Image Image Image
Australia Hazza54321
Pro Player
Winter Champion 2020 x2Donator 01
Posts: 8050
Joined: May 4, 2015
ESO: PrinceofBabu

Re: [Balance] Carbine Cavalry viability

Post by Hazza54321 »

Garja wrote:
Hazza54321 wrote:Zambs arent weak. However if you compare it with ruyters they do seem weak
?
Ruyters have shit 10% rr, zambs 30%, they're pretty much equivalent, except for the royal guard up. Ruyters do cost less.
I mean if you combine ruy with carbines, carbines seem shit
User avatar
Canada Mitoe
Advanced Theory Craftsman
Posts: 5488
Joined: Aug 23, 2015
ESO: Mitoe
GameRanger ID: 346407

Re: [Balance] Carbine Cavalry viability

Post by Mitoe »

A large part of the reason Zambs are good is because they have incredibly good upgrade cards.

I don't think including Amalgamation in the cost calculation is fair. It is a very niche upgrade that is seldom researched; the majority of the time you only get Placer Mines. This makes Ruyters seem a lot better than they actually are, especially since banks don't receive any upgrades but also supply the majority of your coin.
France Le Hussard sur le toit
Howdah
Posts: 1149
Joined: Oct 16, 2019
ESO: LeHussardsurletoit

Re: [Balance] Carbine Cavalry viability

Post by Le Hussard sur le toit »

duckzilla wrote:
TheNameDaniel wrote:USA needs a cav upgrade cos rn no one makes a stable and its sad
This so much. Similar to Swedes, there is just no reason to build a stable.
Sweden actually has one of the best huss in the game.
ESOC : came for the game, stayed for the drama.
Vietnam duckzilla
Jaeger
Posts: 2497
Joined: Jun 26, 2016

Re: [Balance] Carbine Cavalry viability

Post by duckzilla »

Le Hussard sur le toit wrote:
duckzilla wrote:
TheNameDaniel wrote:USA needs a cav upgrade cos rn no one makes a stable and its sad
This so much. Similar to Swedes, there is just no reason to build a stable.
Sweden actually has one of the best huss in the game.
That true, but there is no reason to build hussars. You would need to send 4 upgrade cards to make the hussar that strong. But the opportunity costs are usually too high, because caro+cannon is simply better.
Whatever is written above: this is no financial advice.

Beati pauperes spiritu.
User avatar
Sweden Aussie_Drongo
Skirmisher
Posts: 143
Joined: Oct 29, 2015
ESO: Darkalbino_
Location: Australia

Re: [Balance] Carbine Cavalry viability

Post by Aussie_Drongo »

Miyawaki Sakura wrote:USA already has the strongest musk and streltsy, so the carbine Cavalry shouldn't be strong.
Don't mention the Japanese :chinese:
Image

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

Which top 10 players do you wish to see listed?

All-time

Active last two weeks

Active last month

Supremacy

Treaty

Official

ESOC Patch

Treaty Patch

1v1 Elo

2v2 Elo

3v3 Elo

Power Rating

Which streams do you wish to see listed?

Twitch

Age of Empires III

Age of Empires IV