Incash

General forum about Age of Empires 3 DE. Please post strategy threads, recorded games, user-created content and tech support threads in their respective forum.
Rainbow Land callentournies
Howdah
Posts: 1681
Joined: May 6, 2021
ESO: esuck

Incash

  • Quote

Post by callentournies »

Following what we all watched let'sh dishcush again the queshtionable mechanicsh of Incash.

1) Garrison in fort: can garrishon 50 unitsh in fort, and pop them out with instant attack animation. brooken mechanic. Only need to make one unit type which is an ayboos culverine mortar unit type.
2) Fort stats: base dps higher than EU fortsh, attack increased when doing brooken garrison. only has 24 range and 6k hp; however, irrelevant due to huracash, as we'll dishcush
3) Fort cost: 700 res (EU fortsh cosht 1100 res). Better building costs less.
4) Hurachash: aybooses, culverines, and mortars in one unit in typical sup middle game.
5) Convert: convert
6) Chasquis: more mobile shipment points but you get them for free each age up idk

Where is the line between overreaction and truth? Probably in just point 1).
If I were a petal
And plucked, or moth, plucked
From flowers or pollen froth
To wither on a young child’s
Display. Fetch
Me a ribbon, they, all dead
Things scream.
User avatar
French Southern Territories kevinitalien
Lancer
Posts: 669
Joined: Oct 31, 2015
ESO: KEVINITALIEN
Clan: PLOP

Re: Incash

Post by kevinitalien »

the worst is that the devs know it and i don't even mention the other gimmicks of this civ lol
Attachments
Capture d’écran 2022-04-15 183454.png
Image
Image
Image Image
China Nightingale
Crossbow
Posts: 13
Joined: Oct 9, 2021

Re: Incash

  • Quote

Post by Nightingale »

I missed old days when jap was still the most annoying civ
Rainbow Land callentournies
Howdah
Posts: 1681
Joined: May 6, 2021
ESO: esuck

Re: Incash

Post by callentournies »

I like DE I like new civs and new strats but some new may benefit from tweaking
If I were a petal
And plucked, or moth, plucked
From flowers or pollen froth
To wither on a young child’s
Display. Fetch
Me a ribbon, they, all dead
Things scream.
User avatar
Tuvalu gibson
Ninja
ECL Reigning Champs
Posts: 13598
Joined: May 4, 2015
Location: USA

Re: Incash

Post by gibson »

Military units shouldnt go in buildings, or if they do it shouldnt improve attack, or if it does there should be a low limit/cap or some other type of penalty.
User avatar
French Southern Territories kevinitalien
Lancer
Posts: 669
Joined: Oct 31, 2015
ESO: KEVINITALIEN
Clan: PLOP

Re: Incash

Post by kevinitalien »

gibson wrote:
15 Apr 2022, 16:45
Military units shouldnt go in buildings, or if they do it shouldnt improve attack, or if it does there should be a low limit/cap or some other type of penalty.
the thing is that the devs will NEVER remove this mechanics, that's why we should at least limit this shit
Image
Image
Image Image
User avatar
Tuvalu gibson
Ninja
ECL Reigning Champs
Posts: 13598
Joined: May 4, 2015
Location: USA

Re: Incash

Post by gibson »

Yea, they're pretty set on core mechanics staying the same, so half the number of units in the fort and half the attack each unit adds seems like a decent place to begin, maybe too big, but if so they can adjust.
User avatar
Italy Garja
Retired Contributor
Donator 02
Posts: 9729
Joined: Feb 11, 2015
ESO: Garja

Re: Incash

Post by Garja »

I think the Inca fort is unique enough even without garrisoning mechanic. Inca can have 3 forts costing less resources but being weaker, sounds fair.
They already have Kallanca for the garrisoning thing (which actually makes more sense as it frees pop space).
Chasqui being able to receive shipments is another strong gimmick, and since there can be multiple chasqui on the map it seems potentially too good. Just like the fort, this mechanic is redundant because there are already tambos as extra shipment point.
In general Inca has been released with a great moltitude of unique features, likely too many.
Image Image Image
User avatar
Argentina Jets
Dragoon
Posts: 335
Joined: Nov 19, 2019
ESO: SsJetstream
Clan: FPL

Re: Incash

Post by Jets »

kevinitalien wrote:
15 Apr 2022, 16:47
the thing is that the devs will NEVER remove this mechanics, that's why we should at least limit this shit
They must be so proud of their ideas.
User avatar
United States of America Squamiger
Howdah
Posts: 1756
Joined: Dec 25, 2018
ESO: Squamiger

Re: Incash

Post by Squamiger »

fort wouldn't be so bad if inca didnt have this culv + abus + mortar unit, that can 1.) kill your artillery that you need to deal with the fort 2.) immediately put siege pressure on your base and 3.) counter the units your send to kill them on their own
Monaco redrocket
Musketeer
Posts: 61
Joined: Dec 6, 2021

Re: Incash

Post by redrocket »

I mean imagine nerfing huaraca and having to win games with shitty 17 range junglebows and pikes. They will get fucked by every fast fotress civilization in this game and literally almost every civilization will have better unit scaling.
User avatar
Italy Garja
Retired Contributor
Donator 02
Posts: 9729
Joined: Feb 11, 2015
ESO: Garja

Re: Incash

Post by Garja »

That's not true, bowmen are amazing. However Huaraca are fine too, it's a good but overrated unit. The fort is the problem.
Image Image Image
User avatar
Tuvalu gibson
Ninja
ECL Reigning Champs
Posts: 13598
Joined: May 4, 2015
Location: USA

Re: Incash

Post by gibson »

Bowman are quite good once they get teched with poison, speed etc at which point 17 range is much less relevant. With no cards they are kinda meh though.
Monaco redrocket
Musketeer
Posts: 61
Joined: Dec 6, 2021

Re: Incash

Post by redrocket »

I think the cards for the fortress are the problem for many, improved buildings and monumental architecture not the actual base fotress stats itself. Can kill the base fotress with normal stuff if you understand how inca works.
And maybe the fact that inca can build many fotresses for 400 res is problem too. But shouldn't take from inca without adding, if they take that shit away need to make huaracas better vs artillery like arrows knights with no in fotress garrisoning or something.
User avatar
United States of America n0el
ESOC Business Team
Posts: 7068
Joined: Jul 24, 2015
ESO: jezabob
Clan: 팀 하우스

Re: Incash

Post by n0el »

gibson wrote:
15 Apr 2022, 16:45
Military units shouldnt go in buildings, or if they do it shouldnt improve attack, or if it does there should be a low limit/cap or some other type of penalty.
They should go into euro forts too
mad cuz bad
User avatar
United States of America Squamiger
Howdah
Posts: 1756
Joined: Dec 25, 2018
ESO: Squamiger

Re: Incash

Post by Squamiger »

lol thats absolutely going to happen eventually
User avatar
Italy Garja
Retired Contributor
Donator 02
Posts: 9729
Joined: Feb 11, 2015
ESO: Garja

Re: Incash

Post by Garja »

Ahah that would be the ultimate meme fix for the problem, I can see it happening.
So the attempt to transfrom aoe3 meta into aoe2 would be finally accomplished.
Image Image Image
Australia Kawapasaka
ESOC Pro Team
Posts: 1116
Joined: Jan 25, 2019
Location: Wales (new, south)

Re: Incash

Post by Kawapasaka »

i'm a big fan of the cool-down option personally (assuming that getting it removed entirely is never gonna happen)
User avatar
Italy Garja
Retired Contributor
Donator 02
Posts: 9729
Joined: Feb 11, 2015
ESO: Garja

Re: Incash

Post by Garja »

and what woul the logic be? cleaning lady gotta do his job so dirty soldiers can't enter the fort?
Image Image Image
User avatar
Tuvalu gibson
Ninja
ECL Reigning Champs
Posts: 13598
Joined: May 4, 2015
Location: USA

Re: Incash

Post by gibson »

Garja wrote:
15 Apr 2022, 22:37
and what woul the logic be? cleaning lady gotta do his job so dirty soldiers can't enter the fort?
Dude there doesn’t have to be logic to it besides it helps with balance
User avatar
French Southern Territories kevinitalien
Lancer
Posts: 669
Joined: Oct 31, 2015
ESO: KEVINITALIEN
Clan: PLOP

Re: Incash

Post by kevinitalien »

The simplest and fastest for me is to reduce the number of units who can garrison the fort, personally i would have capped at 15 units who can garrison, with 15 the fort remains strong and does not prevents the opponent from being able to take a fight because of this limit at 50 (lol)
And also the idea of ​​reducing the damage of the fort is not for me the main problem, it's just this problem of garrisoning your fucking military unit, thats nothing to do in this game wtf, even after a year and a half i still don't understand why it's in this game
Image
Image
Image Image
User avatar
Italy Garja
Retired Contributor
Donator 02
Posts: 9729
Joined: Feb 11, 2015
ESO: Garja

Re: Incash

Post by Garja »

gibson wrote:
15 Apr 2022, 22:45
Dude there doesn’t have to be logic to it besides it helps with balance
There has to be a design logic when there are other valid alternatives with a design logic.
kevinitalien wrote:
15 Apr 2022, 23:05
with 15 the fort remains strong and does not prevents the opponent from being able to take a fight because of this limit at 50 (lol)
It has already been nerfed to 25 units iirc
Image Image Image
User avatar
French Southern Territories kevinitalien
Lancer
Posts: 669
Joined: Oct 31, 2015
ESO: KEVINITALIEN
Clan: PLOP

Re: Incash

Post by kevinitalien »

Garja wrote:
15 Apr 2022, 23:26
gibson wrote:
15 Apr 2022, 22:45
Dude there doesn’t have to be logic to it besides it helps with balance
There has to be a design logic when there are other valid alternatives with a design logic.
kevinitalien wrote:
15 Apr 2022, 23:05
with 15 the fort remains strong and does not prevents the opponent from being able to take a fight because of this limit at 50 (lol)
It has already been nerfed to 25 units iirc
no
Attachments
Capture d’écran 2022-04-16 014316.png
Image
Image
Image Image
User avatar
Italy Garja
Retired Contributor
Donator 02
Posts: 9729
Joined: Feb 11, 2015
ESO: Garja

Re: Incash

Post by Garja »

I think only the damage has been capped to 25 then. I somewhat remember it being a change in some patch.
Image Image Image
User avatar
United States of America n0el
ESOC Business Team
Posts: 7068
Joined: Jul 24, 2015
ESO: jezabob
Clan: 팀 하우스

Re: Incash

Post by n0el »

Change to 15 seems like a no brainer as well as doing the same for euro forts
mad cuz bad

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

Which top 10 players do you wish to see listed?

All-time

Active last two weeks

Active last month

Supremacy

Treaty

Official

ESOC Patch

Treaty Patch

1v1 Elo

2v2 Elo

3v3 Elo

Power Rating

Which streams do you wish to see listed?

Twitch

Age of Empires III

Age of Empires IV