Group D
Re: Group D
Ok, if you prefere another time, let me know aswell
Re: Group D
GiBthedurrty wrote:i forfeit
wtf but you said you can play any day from here to the 20 yesterday...
Re: Group D
ok apparently we are playing it tomorow (me vs gib) scheduled at 20gmt for now but we can move if there is a better time for a caster @Media Team
Re: Group D
Btw can you veto your map @GiBthedurrty ?
Re: Group D
I am waiting for you @GiBthedurrty thanks to keep me awared if you don't come.
-
- Lancer
- Posts: 723
- Joined: Aug 8, 2016
- ESO: Marco1698
Re: Group D
That's the best attempt in scheduling everGiBthedurrty wrote:hi
Re: Group D
I am out due to lower seed, nice rules ! I don't know who the fuck though this was fair to select the winner by this way but that's fucking stupide.
-
- Lancer
- Posts: 723
- Joined: Aug 8, 2016
- ESO: Marco1698
Re: Group D
Would be good if someone fixes esoc elo honestly
Re: Group D
@bwinner
@DaRkNiTe1698
Hi guys. Indeed, because all players in this group have a match record of 1-1 with 3 games won we must go by Group Stage Tiebreaker Rule #3) Highest ELO which means that @GiBthedurrty will move on to the next round vs OPTIMUS__PRIME. For the rest of you, however, there is still an opportunity to play - the Second Chance tournament sign-ups are open by way of your MyESOC panel. You can review the rules for the Second Chance tournament here.
@DaRkNiTe1698
Hi guys. Indeed, because all players in this group have a match record of 1-1 with 3 games won we must go by Group Stage Tiebreaker Rule #3) Highest ELO which means that @GiBthedurrty will move on to the next round vs OPTIMUS__PRIME. For the rest of you, however, there is still an opportunity to play - the Second Chance tournament sign-ups are open by way of your MyESOC panel. You can review the rules for the Second Chance tournament here.
-
- Lancer
- Posts: 723
- Joined: Aug 8, 2016
- ESO: Marco1698
Re: Group D
It was my best tourney probably xD
Gl gib
Gl gib
Re: Group D
All one win, same goal average, They should play FFA now!
Re: Group D
[spoiler=Step 1][/spoiler]
[spoiler=Step 2][/spoiler]
[spoiler=???][/spoiler]
[spoiler=??????][/spoiler]
[spoiler=profit!][/spoiler]
[spoiler=Step 2][/spoiler]
[spoiler=???][/spoiler]
[spoiler=??????][/spoiler]
[spoiler=profit!][/spoiler]
Re: Group D
No idea what happened here but if all players are tied, there should, there must be a tie breaker based on scheduling attempts. Bwinner tried to schedule, git said he forfeits.. no idea how he moves on indeed when he forfit and made no attempts to schedule another match before the deadline. Seems weird
A little Cocaine never hurt nobody!
Re: Group D
Like literally gib made the worst attemps to schedule out of these 3 players. And you're going to let him move on?
A little Cocaine never hurt nobody!
-
- Ninja
- Posts: 13004
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
Re:
Lecastete wrote:Imagine a champions league group where the 4 clubs draw each other, real madrid goes 1/8th final because they won more champions league than the others ?
actually, it's kinda the same. But not because of more champions league finals, but because of more goals scored (provided it was RM). Maybe instead of elo, we can do most units killed? XD
to be honest, tiebreakers are never really fair. They exist because all fair measures have been exhausted and ended in a tie. Japan went to the next round in World Cup because they had less yellow cards or something. I mean it's a rule, but is it fair? They also could've chosen most attempts on goal, or most KM run during matches, or anything else.
- juliuscaesar007
- Musketeer
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Jan 4, 2017
- ESO: juliuscaesar007
Re: Group D
think indeed no tie breaker rules are fair. This is maybe a wild suggestion and would take extra time and work but what if we had a jury like thing wich looks at all the replays in case of a tie in group. Then they can give something like score for who they think they played best and thus deserves to go trough?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests