deleted_user wrote:I think nerfing cease fire would put india in bad spot. Zamburaks RR were nerfed, so you would like to go with sepoy + urumi stuffs which somppu showed a good way to play it and Instead of dealing against these new strats, ep is nerfing them. It won't help to balance anything, will reduce the variety, at the end of the day it will be same story as what was done to water.
somppukunkku wrote:[Armag] diarouga wrote:somppukunkku wrote:[Armag] diarouga wrote:I guess there's an India lobby too haha. It's just less powerful than the ger lobby.
It's just painful that you create a playstyle for a civ that ignores the civ weaknesses like bad anti-art and bad cav in 2018, 11 years after release, and then some people don't even want to analyze their own mistakes before wanting to make it completely useless in 2019.
Same with aztec FI and water tbh, but it got nerfed, that's how it works.
To be fair, basically only the bug part of aztec FI was nerfed?
With water can't disagree and I still think they nerfed it too hard because people didn't want to learn to play against it.
Thats the point, like when we ask why monitors were nerfed to Zoi, he said they were too op, but he misses the point that you should be rewarded for holding the sea control and it's your reward. But I think in general, new strats/ways are rather not welcomed sadly.
1. EP hasn't nerfed Ceasefire.
2. EP has also nerfed Sepoys. What's your point?
3. You seem awfully confident in Ceasefire not being a balance issue.
4. You seem awfully incapable of understanding that if something is unbalanced enough, it makes sense to balance it, whether it's the Aztec War Chief, Monitors, or The Exiled Prince. It's funny how, in your mind, certain things arbitrarily cannot be unbalanced and are untouchable.
5. I didn't miss that point. I absolutely agree that sea control should be rewarded ā it just doesn't justify Monitors being both game-breaking and uncounterable.
Your bias and flawed logic are just silly, sometimes.