toriancarconn wrote:@Garja, this is insightful. Thank you for posting it.
Since I'm only playing the RE version, can you point me to any earlier, RE related Aztec posts of yours?
Ye, that's before it was nerfed to the ground.
It was tier 1 on the RE, a nice surprise strat on EP5, and now it simply shouldn't work against a good opponent.
i guess it's because you build your warhut quiet late from the 700 wood of the second shipment so a very fast pressure like two uhlans raid from first shipment of germany while you are building this warhut can be defended by this big button if needed
toriancarconn wrote:@Garja, this is insightful. Thank you for posting it.
Since I'm only playing the RE version, can you point me to any earlier, RE related Aztec posts of yours?
toriancarconn wrote:@Garja, this is insightful. Thank you for posting it.
Since I'm only playing the RE version, can you point me to any earlier, RE related Aztec posts of yours?
you are only referring it is outdated if one playes on EP, right?
I only play on RE.
Regardless of the patch it's outdated, there are better strategies now. The 2 skull build is worse than the fast age up build, though the difference is not huge.
How can I find out about these better strategies? Any link you can point me to?
I appreciate your help.
[Armag] diarouga wrote:
toriancarconn wrote:
Show hidden quotes
[Armag] diarouga wrote:
toriancarconn wrote:@Garja, this is insightful. Thank you for posting it.
Since I'm only playing the RE version, can you point me to any earlier, RE related Aztec posts of yours?
you are only referring it is outdated if one playes on EP, right?
I only play on RE.
Regardless of the patch it's outdated, there are better strategies now. The 2 skull build is worse than the fast age up build, though the difference is not huge.
thank you. I've actually already seen that video. What about other strats? Any material about rush and FF strats?
Is it true that beyond age 2 Pumas and Maces don't have value? I often see the Mace temple card in decks, along with the inifinite mace card in age 4, which is why I wonder if maces aren't legit for age 3 and 4, too.
Rondom wrote:Hi
There is a good description on YouTube by Diarouga
toriancarconn wrote:thank you. I've actually already seen that video. What about other strats? Any material about rush and FF strats?
Is it true that beyond age 2 Pumas and Maces don't have value? I often see the Mace temple card in decks, along with the inifinite mace card in age 4, which is why I wonder if maces aren't legit for age 3 and 4, too.
Rondom wrote:Hi
There is a good description on YouTube by Diarouga
Link:
Enjoy! :)
Maces are good in late game too, you want to make eagle knights instead of pikes in age 3+ however.
toriancarconn wrote:Got it. So even on RE maces in age 3 and 4 make sense, too. I thought, from age 3 onwards, ERKs replace Maces and JPKs replace Pumas.
Jaguars are bad so they don't replace anything haha. Honestly, pumas might be better than jaguars even in age 3^^.
Erk is your main unit in age 3 but erk is a goon type unit while maces are bows so you need both.
A common mistake Aztec players make is not putting villagers onto the firepit for attack dance for crucial battles. 10 WP is 21% attack boost, add 15 villagers and it jumps to 38%. For key battles that extra 17% can make all the difference.