Jotunir wrote:Squamiger wrote:And they would then also be like their aom Greeks counterpart, the melee goon with a lance whose Greek name I forget
Prodromos.
Prostagma
Jotunir wrote:Squamiger wrote:And they would then also be like their aom Greeks counterpart, the melee goon with a lance whose Greek name I forget
Prodromos.
Squamiger wrote:Jotunir wrote:Squamiger wrote:And they would then also be like their aom Greeks counterpart, the melee goon with a lance whose Greek name I forget
Prodromos.
Prostagma
Jotunir wrote:Squamiger wrote:Show hidden quotes
Prostagma
Vulome
gamevideo113 wrote:Jotunir wrote:Show hidden quotes
Vulome
Ishwolli
gamevideo113 wrote:Jotunir wrote:Show hidden quotes
Vulome
Ishwolli
Rohbrot wrote:gamevideo113 wrote:Show hidden quotes
Ishwolli
Zeus hoplits go Brr Brr!
Rohbrot wrote:gamevideo113 wrote:Show hidden quotes
Ishwolli
Zeus hoplits go Brr Brr!
gamevideo113 wrote:Etimos
breeze wrote:yeah facts are facts, and you are BAD.
[Armag] diarouga wrote:Playing Aztec is a 10% handicap
LoOk_tOm wrote:I have something in particular against Kaisar (GERMANY NOOB mercenary LAMME FOREVER) And the other people (noobs) like suck kaiser ... just this ..
Luciofrancosi wrote:To be fair I think the unit overall is fine.
They are not the best on their own. But they complement other units really well.
Rod/lancer for example is a really scary combo right now.
Most civs won't even use musketeers after age 3 anyway and the ones that rely on HI as anti cav will still have to deal with lancers and skirms
Jotunir wrote:Luciofrancosi wrote:To be fair I think the unit overall is fine.
They are not the best on their own. But they complement other units really well.
Rod/lancer for example is a really scary combo right now.
Most civs won't even use musketeers after age 3 anyway and the ones that rely on HI as anti cav will still have to deal with lancers and skirms
Still Rods seem weak, fast but frail. And people use HI after age 3. For example, I almost always use the Stadhoulders from the church card if the game goes past age 3.
helln00 wrote:if you guys want to buff rods against infantry, why not just buff their melee resist?
Luciofrancosi wrote:Jotunir wrote:Luciofrancosi wrote:To be fair I think the unit overall is fine.
They are not the best on their own. But they complement other units really well.
Rod/lancer for example is a really scary combo right now.
Most civs won't even use musketeers after age 3 anyway and the ones that rely on HI as anti cav will still have to deal with lancers and skirms
Still Rods seem weak, fast but frail. And people use HI after age 3. For example, I almost always use the Stadhoulders from the church card if the game goes past age 3.
It depends.
On dutch case stadhouders come already upgraded and are good complementary units, specially if you add artillery, however they still die to skirms, and if they are gone you can't train them anymore.
And spain on late game is quite strong right now, specially with unction. Buffing the unit right now is probably a very dangerous move as it could make the civ op.
Rohbrot wrote:helln00 wrote:if you guys want to buff rods against infantry, why not just buff their melee resist?
Cuz its already 40% what is pretty good.
helln00 wrote:Rohbrot wrote:helln00 wrote:if you guys want to buff rods against infantry, why not just buff their melee resist?
Cuz its already 40% what is pretty good.
but apparently its not good enough if the thread is to be believed, just make them fast teutonic knights and make aoe2 players jealous
Rohbrot wrote:helln00 wrote:Show hidden quotes
but apparently its not good enough if the thread is to be believed, just make them fast teutonic knights and make aoe2 players jealous
The thread is actually about "how can we make rods more effective against HI" if you read the posts and increasing melee resist isnt a solution.
Which top 10 players do you wish to see listed?
Which streams do you wish to see listed?