fei123456 wrote: ↑23 May 2022, 11:10
Actually it's fun to read those things, if I know they're not true.
The best propaganda is a propaganda that doesn't always lie but simply mixes truth and lie until you can no longer differentiate between the two. And that is happening here. Some of the things you mention are right or partially right. But most are not.
fei123456 wrote: ↑23 May 2022, 11:10
Our media is saying
-Ukraine take back Kyiv and Kharkov just because
Russian doesn't want them anymore. They didn't destroy many Russian troops on their retreat, so it's quite acceptable for Russia.
This is arguably true. But Russia "doesn't want them anymore" because Russia realized that it is not capable of taking the two cities. Russia lost a lot of men and material on the outskirts of Kyiv. So this is the part where the statement becomes wrong.
fei123456 wrote: ↑23 May 2022, 11:10
Our media is saying-The defending in Donbas is suicide. Ukraine troops are ready to surrender, especially after the fallen of Mariupol after 3 months.
Defending is always the favorable position compared to attacking. Especially in Donbass, Ukrainian troops had
8 years to dig themselves in. So no, defending Donbas is less suicide than attacking Donbas. Of course Russia hopes that Ukrainian morale is low, but, from what we learned about this war up to now, at least the same is true for Russian troops that desert their units or leave their equipment out in the open. The fall of Mariupol is not a sudden blow. Hence, it is not intuitive why Ukrainian resistance should begin to falter with its loss.
fei123456 wrote: ↑23 May 2022, 11:10
-Russian eco is getting better and better, and Putin is planning to hold the war for years, destroying western economy permanently.
"Russian eco" is a joke to begin with. The country's economy is the size of a mid-sized European country. Even if it could hold the war for years (which is questionable), the Russian economy is in no position to deeply hurt the western economy. And, at least as important, important other countries like China don't have any incentive to weaken western economies, because their own ones are likely to go down the drain with it.[/quote]
fei123456 wrote: ↑23 May 2022, 11:10
-The western is grabbing grains from Ukraine, to put millions of Ukraine people in starve, just as what Stalin did.
That's exactly what Russia does. So.... just no. A plain lie.
fei123456 wrote: ↑23 May 2022, 11:10
-Poland is about to invade Ukraine for territory.
The Polish president was in Kyiv just yesterday and held a speech in the Ukrainian parliament (the first head of state of another country to do so!). He confirmed the friendship of the two nations, state that Poland will do its best to help Ukraine to become a part of the European Union and declared that all hostilities that the two countries had in the past are history now and will for no longer burden the relation between them. So... again the opposite of what is happening.
fei123456 wrote: ↑23 May 2022, 11:10
-Even if Russian lost soldiers and weapons, the war is on Ukraine land. Millions are escaping, the richest lands are lost, and Ukraine has no future: so Putin still wins.
Sure, the war is on Ukrainian land and millions are escaping. However, the land is neither lost nor did Ukraine lose its future. Putin winning is not a reality up to now.
fei123456 wrote: ↑23 May 2022, 11:10
-Merkel is right, but the brain-washed Germans don't deserve a wise political like her.
Don't know what's meant with this. But, obviously, the "brain-washed" accusation tells more about China than about Germany.
Whatever is written above: this is no financial advice.
Beati pauperes spiritu.