Mosx wrote:I would. Play against someone 10 pr higher than me for increase my skill for exemple
That's a decent mindset, but most others don't share it cause it's too frustrating for them. Tho you probably don't learn too much from getting rekt by a much better player.
you'd learn if you ask the right questions and watch the recs.
join the tournament and i'll let you see firsthand how much lukas has grown
i play him all the time, i know already
different experience when they knock you out in a best of 5 tho
Mosx wrote:I would. Play against someone 10 pr higher than me for increase my skill for exemple
That's a decent mindset, but most others don't share it cause it's too frustrating for them. Tho you probably don't learn too much from getting rekt by a much better player.
you'd learn if you ask the right questions and watch the recs.
join the tournament and i'll let you see firsthand how much lukas has grown
i play him all the time, i know already
different experience when they knock you out in a best of 5 tho
psht. Never. This old dog still knows a trick or two! Luckass ain't got nothing on me!
IAmSoldieR wrote:I think the flaw is using current ep elo, rather than max ep elo. That would surely stop people from point sitting, as they would have more to gain from playing.
The biggest flaw is that you can get points from lobby games as opposed to quicksearch. This was brought up briefly but ultimately ignored as the ladder either couldn't check if a game was played on quicksearch or not or there was no time to implement this.
But beware: if you get into the lan by bashing lieutenants only, you will be named and shamed in several interviews on the stream.
IAmSoldieR wrote:I think the flaw is using current ep elo, rather than max ep elo. That would surely stop people from point sitting, as they would have more to gain from playing.
The biggest flaw is that you can get points from lobby games as opposed to quicksearch. This was brought up briefly but ultimately ignored as the ladder either couldn't check if a game was played on quicksearch or not or there was no time to implement this.
But beware: if you get into the lan by bashing lieutenants only, you will be named and shamed in several interviews on the stream.
IAmSoldieR wrote:I think the flaw is using current ep elo, rather than max ep elo. That would surely stop people from point sitting, as they would have more to gain from playing.
The biggest flaw is that you can get points from lobby games as opposed to quicksearch. This was brought up briefly but ultimately ignored as the ladder either couldn't check if a game was played on quicksearch or not or there was no time to implement this.
But beware: if you get into the lan by bashing lieutenants only, you will be named and shamed in several interviews on the stream.
Yeah, which is ultimately almost impossible to utilize by the ladder - unless all rated games are required to be QS and recorded and the recordings uploaded to ESOC. Even then it would require significant changes in the way ladder currently works.
Garja wrote:Can use a separate map set for qs to detect qs games?
could work, but only if that map set can't be picked in a hosted game, and those maps are not part of any other random map set. Then you can tell them apart by capital letter.