ESOCommunity

charlemagen

My biggest problem is the uneducated statements and responses from some the the sup community, TR is not brainless and unskilled. I guess this also applies to some ppl of the TR community. No it does not, tr players are not attacking sup. we just want to clarify that it is not a noob, no skill, no ...

charlemagen

No, sup as a whole involves more skill then tr does mainly because it has evolved more due to the much larger number of players. Also that the the competitive scene has more players to challenge each other thus furthering improvement. My biggest problem is the uneducated statements and responses fro...

charlemagen

I was merely using lukas brit push as an example to define what pressure is in treaty. I have already said that sup has more depth in game play many times, so as far as you saying your building eco and raiding at the same time I just dont care. Your arguments are invalid because you do not nor have...

charlemagen

PLEASE. Firstly water boom is a joke. tr40 has pressure across the map and fights are usually in more than one location. and comparing your walling to treaty walling is like comparing tr and sup together in the first place. You think there is no pressure in treaty? fight Lukas brits, or at the leas...

charlemagen

PLEASE. Firstly water boom is a joke. tr40 has pressure across the map and fights are usually in more than one location. and comparing your walling to treaty walling is like comparing tr and sup together in the first place. You think there is no pressure in treaty? fight Lukas brits, or at the leas...

charlemagen

You are arrogant in the majority of your posts by naming treaty the game mode and players as a whole for unskilled. The sup players who have played both at a high level of play are the only ones that should be able to criticize treaty. You are just spouting off ideas other people have said around y...

charlemagen

Dont play treaty guys I dont really give a fuck what you think about treaty, but please dont tell others not to play it. Just because you think the game type is trash and cant enjoy it, doesnt mean that others cant. Ill probably post more on this thread later because my name has been mentioned way ...

charlemagen

Diarouga I thought I already made this clear, you should not post unless you are educated upon both matters. Your statement is merely and opinion and you are presenting it as fact. Which in turn makes you look like an arrogant noob. just trying to help you out <'3 I was answering to adderbrain, h...

charlemagen

sc wrote:
yurashic wrote:Haha, this thread is treaty players being arrogant and sup players trying to calm them down.
WE ARE NOT ARROGANT OR UNREASONABLE STFU

+1

charlemagen

Treaty is much better if you want a decisive competitive game im0. In rush one careless mistake with one unit can cost you te game. How silly!!! And that happens to the best of us. In treaty the better player most always wins. One dumb misclick wont ruin your entire game . In an imperfect technical...

charlemagen

this thread is cancer.

charlemagen

oi goodspeed your booms were dubunked years ago as jerom said. offline booming grossly inflates score. even playing online the score differs depending on latency. its unfortunate but this means you need to take scores with a grain of salt, and look at the actual boom step by step to see if it was g...

charlemagen

no sup has more depth has I already have stated, does not make it harder make it more interesting to some. The comparison to sup as chess is not a good one, i would choose another. comparing the two is like comparing NASCAR to Indy car racing, saying Indy car racing is harder just because they go f...

charlemagen

gibson wrote:
charlemagen wrote:2x2 is, 1v1s are simply retarded because andes is so small as a 1v1 map.

okay Ill do 2x2 then. Could you be bothered to write me out a Bo real quick because I dont really wanna watch that whole video

charlemagen

1st of all ur not funny. i started to play tr and i never touched supremacy This isnt meant to be funny. Supremacy and tr are 2 different kind of games and surpremacy requires more mechs and more strategy. That s as if you were playing chess and started at the 20th moove, it is definitely easier be...

charlemagen

There is the basic port boom, they are one of the easiest civs to play and they are arguably the best out of nats. This deck is old, so all you need to add is 2 port explorers and the explorer att. and hp. card. plat 50 tr games and come try to vs either the top tier, AJIV, sergyou7 or myself. or i...

charlemagen

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nHUO7SLVwI If you wanna do me a solid and write out the build order and/or post a picture of the port deck then I will play basically just tr for the next two weeks and see where I am at the end. There is the basic port boom, they are one of the easiest civs to play...

charlemagen

better boom i doubt cuz we boom almost perfecf , macro skills not rlly i would say better micro even that would be close , i will say top sup players would be good but not even close to top tier doubt it. Im pretty bad at sup but give me a Bo and two weeks and Id be playing in games with top tier p...

charlemagen

Thing is a lot of skills translate. Booming is very easy it''s just 1 single build order and it''s the same every game. A sup player has no issue following a build, because in sup you need to know a lot of builds and you need to actually know how and why they work. This is why I was able to watch a...

charlemagen

cometk wrote:goodspeed is right gentlemen, just pack it up and leave

First of all Trevor sh.

charlemagen

This may just be my opinion, but I believe I can clear this up. Yes it is true that sup(rush) has 1k more depth then treaty does. More viable Civs more viable build orders and a greater amount of relatively good players. Saying treaty is easier than sup because we have only 1-2 build orders is just ...

ESOC

Top Live Streams

Legacy AoE3

Search found 471 matches

Let's end the treaty vs rush debate.

Let's end the treaty vs rush debate.

Let's end the treaty vs rush debate.

Let's end the treaty vs rush debate.

Let's end the treaty vs rush debate.

Let's end the treaty vs rush debate.

Let's end the treaty vs rush debate.

Let's end the treaty vs rush debate.

Let's end the treaty vs rush debate.

Let's end the treaty vs rush debate.

Let's end the treaty vs rush debate.

Let's end the treaty vs rush debate.

Let's end the treaty vs rush debate.

Let's end the treaty vs rush debate.

Let's end the treaty vs rush debate.

Let's end the treaty vs rush debate.

Let's end the treaty vs rush debate.

Let's end the treaty vs rush debate.

Let's end the treaty vs rush debate.

Let's end the treaty vs rush debate.

Let's end the treaty vs rush debate.

Terms

About ESOC

ESOC Projects

Social Links