Strongest age 2 civ

Which civ is the strongest in Age 2???

Aztecs
5
6%
Britain
11
14%
China
0
No votes
Dutch
0
No votes
France
0
No votes
Germany
1
1%
Iroquois
3
4%
India
13
17%
Japan
17
22%
Ottomans
9
12%
Portuguese
0
No votes
Russia
17
22%
Spain
0
No votes
Sioux
2
3%
 
Total votes: 78

User avatar
France [Armag] diarouga
Ninja
NWC LAN Gold
Posts: 12710
Joined: Feb 26, 2015
ESO: diarouga
Location: France

Re: Strongest age 2 civ

Post by [Armag] diarouga »

Noone goes gurkha/zam/sowar against brit anymore, but before the sepoy rush meta (in the first days of ESOC), the standard was to go for the H2O 600w/300e/trickle full greed build as India vs Brit, and win in late colonial with that composition, and that MU was already considered to be hopeless for Brit.
VC semi counters that, but although lb seem great, the India army is superior cost effectively.
Vietnam duckzilla
Jaeger
Posts: 2497
Joined: Jun 26, 2016

Re: Strongest age 2 civ

Post by duckzilla »

To me, India always depends on the micro skill of the player. If you have infinite time to micro your stuff, India should be the best colo civ by far. Simply because every single unit is better at countering what it is supposed to counter than the units of any other colo civ. You further have Agra to gain map control and your boom is not bad as well. However, only a few players can actually max out India gameplay. As soon as you don't micro your units optimally, you quickly lose the advantage of them hard countering the opponent's units and turn it into a disadvantage because your units (except sepoy) are bad generalists.

Overall, Russia is the best colo civ, because you cannot do too much wrong. It is comparatively less micro intense, has one of the best pre-fortress booms, can gain map control and has good shipments.
Whatever is written above: this is no financial advice.

Beati pauperes spiritu.
User avatar
Holy See Imperial Noob
Lancer
Posts: 958
Joined: Feb 29, 2016
Location: Well hello DEre

Re: Strongest age 2 civ

Post by Imperial Noob »

[Armag] diarouga wrote:Noone goes gurkha/zam/sowar against brit anymore, but before the sepoy rush meta (in the first days of ESOC), the standard was to go for the H2O 600w/300e/trickle full greed build as India vs Brit, and win in late colonial with that composition, and that MU was already considered to be hopeless for Brit.
VC semi counters that, but although lb seem great, the India army is superior cost effectively.
Why do you think H2O went with Brits into the 9th game against BSOP in a tournament finals if this MU was so hopeless?
User avatar
France [Armag] diarouga
Ninja
NWC LAN Gold
Posts: 12710
Joined: Feb 26, 2015
ESO: diarouga
Location: France

Re: Strongest age 2 civ

Post by [Armag] diarouga »

Imperial Noob wrote:
[Armag] diarouga wrote:Noone goes gurkha/zam/sowar against brit anymore, but before the sepoy rush meta (in the first days of ESOC), the standard was to go for the H2O 600w/300e/trickle full greed build as India vs Brit, and win in late colonial with that composition, and that MU was already considered to be hopeless for Brit.
VC semi counters that, but although lb seem great, the India army is superior cost effectively.
Why do you think H2O went with Brits into the 9th game against BSOP in a tournament finals if this MU was so hopeless?
Because he was wrong :)
Australia Hazza54321
Pro Player
Winter Champion 2020 x2Donator 01
Posts: 8050
Joined: May 4, 2015
ESO: PrinceofBabu

Re: Strongest age 2 civ

Post by Hazza54321 »

Imperial Noob wrote:
[Armag] diarouga wrote:Noone goes gurkha/zam/sowar against brit anymore, but before the sepoy rush meta (in the first days of ESOC), the standard was to go for the H2O 600w/300e/trickle full greed build as India vs Brit, and win in late colonial with that composition, and that MU was already considered to be hopeless for Brit.
VC semi counters that, but although lb seem great, the India army is superior cost effectively.
Why do you think H2O went with Brits into the 9th game against BSOP in a tournament finals if this MU was so hopeless?
because at the time people thought brit beat india then it switched with the meta switch, ironically, now that MU i think is brit favoured because of their age up choices
User avatar
Italy Garja
Retired Contributor
Donator 02
Posts: 9730
Joined: Feb 11, 2015
ESO: Garja

Re: Strongest age 2 civ

Post by Garja »

Clearly I don't go gurka/zamb vs lbows. I go gurka/sowar in that case. Both civs will end up in a 3 unit combo and India one is far better after camel upgrades.
Image Image Image
User avatar
Italy Garja
Retired Contributor
Donator 02
Posts: 9730
Joined: Feb 11, 2015
ESO: Garja

Re: Strongest age 2 civ

Post by Garja »

Imperial Noob wrote:
[Armag] diarouga wrote:Noone goes gurkha/zam/sowar against brit anymore, but before the sepoy rush meta (in the first days of ESOC), the standard was to go for the H2O 600w/300e/trickle full greed build as India vs Brit, and win in late colonial with that composition, and that MU was already considered to be hopeless for Brit.
VC semi counters that, but although lb seem great, the India army is superior cost effectively.
Why do you think H2O went with Brits into the 9th game against BSOP in a tournament finals if this MU was so hopeless?
Because before the camel cards it is close and if your opponent goes for sepoy instead of zambs (which BSOP would do) then India loses a good chunk of the unit advantage.
Image Image Image
User avatar
No Flag Good ol Ivan
Howdah
Posts: 1345
Joined: Mar 31, 2015
ESO: ivanelterrible

Re: Strongest age 2 civ

Post by Good ol Ivan »

If you can't micro it's Russia.
If you can micro it's India.
If you like treaty and hate aoe3 it's Japan.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests

Which top 10 players do you wish to see listed?

All-time

Active last two weeks

Active last month

Supremacy

Treaty

Official

ESOC Patch

Treaty Patch

1v1 Elo

2v2 Elo

3v3 Elo

Power Rating

Which streams do you wish to see listed?

Twitch

Age of Empires III

Age of Empires IV