ruyters are lame
Re: ruyters are lame
Another classic dick measuring contest, brought to you by Diarouga and Garja. Why don't you guys meet up and smack your dicks together, and really assert your dominance? Record the results please. I don't think anybody will be satisfied unless we see at least one dick partially severed from a body.
Re: ruyters are lame
hunter wrote:Jerom wrote:I dont understand why everyone wants to bash garja over his opinions. Yes, sometimes his opinions and statements seem to make little sense. But instead of bashing them, why not try to see the sense in them. Garja is a better player than most of us here, so theres chance his vision on the game is correct at least to some extend.
Whats so funny about this? Hes a top32 player, possibly even better, judging from tournaments.
Re: ruyters are lame
Jerom wrote:hunter wrote:Jerom wrote:I dont understand why everyone wants to bash garja over his opinions. Yes, sometimes his opinions and statements seem to make little sense. But instead of bashing them, why not try to see the sense in them. Garja is a better player than most of us here, so theres chance his vision on the game is correct at least to some extend.
Whats so funny about this? Hes a top32 player, possibly even better, judging from tournaments.
Forgive my bluntness but to put it straight garja is a self obsessed human being who thinks he is top 3 at this which gets only more ridiculed by the hype and status of so called god people like you give to him. He is good but that's it maybe top 50 atm top 10 on his best day probably but that's it. Considering all time of aoe 3 the list is so long that by the garja number pops up most would have torn the paper into pieces
Jerom wrote: Garja is a better player than most of us here
Jerom wrote:Please don't bump old threads, especially when all you have to say is "lol"
Re: ruyters are lame
I'd be willing to pay international shipping to send both of them rulers. I doubt I need anything longer than 10 cm but I'd send 30 cm just to be safe.lesllamas wrote:Another classic dick measuring contest, brought to you by Diarouga and Garja. Why don't you guys meet up and smack your dicks together, and really assert your dominance? Record the results please. I don't think anybody will be satisfied unless we see at least one dick partially severed from a body.
Re: ruyters are lame
hunter wrote:Jerom wrote:Show hidden quotes
Whats so funny about this? Hes a top32 player, possibly even better, judging from tournaments.
Forgive my bluntness but to put it straight garja is a self obsessed human being who thinks he is top 3 at this which gets only more ridiculed by the hype and status of so called god people like you give to him. He is good but that's it maybe top 50 atm top 10 on his best day probably but that's it. Considering all time of aoe 3 the list is so long that by the garja number pops up most would have torn the paper into pieces
okay so he's still better than most of us here? Maybe Garja is sometimes a bit overconfident but you can't blame him for this really. He;s constantly getting baited for anything he says..
- [Armag] diarouga
- Ninja
- Posts: 12710
- Joined: Feb 26, 2015
- ESO: diarouga
- Location: France
Re: ruyters are lame
Because he doesn't admit that he is wrong sometimes lol and because he doesn't bring arguments.
Even if people tend to forget that, I am quite often wrong and I admit that. I also bring arguments most of the time. I had a discussion with garja about sending schooners on GL and he just answered that people do it (he couldn't tell who) and that I don't understand the game.
Btw Osmane got banned, lol
Even if people tend to forget that, I am quite often wrong and I admit that. I also bring arguments most of the time. I had a discussion with garja about sending schooners on GL and he just answered that people do it (he couldn't tell who) and that I don't understand the game.
Btw Osmane got banned, lol
Re: ruyters are lame
That's simply not true. I could tell you just go watch the last 10k TAD games that you find between AS and the JP sitea nd you'll find like 100 instances of people sending schooners on GL.
There isn't even an argument here. Anyone who played this game for atleast 3-4 years knows perfectly that spring GL is a water map and that water is key to control the map, on top of booming.
Just because you ignore those things doesn't mean what I say is wrong or anything. You only admit you're wrong when you are exposed to the crude truth after claiming something and disregarding other opinions like you just did here. You should just accept that it is impossible for anyone to know the game perfectly so you cannot make claims like you do.
Now, back to the fuckin topic. Ruyter spam is a thing. There is no fuckin doubt about that. And yes, I saw people complaining about it already, which leads me to say that it can be considered as lame as laming goons, which is, again, something that I heard people complaining about.
There isn't even an argument here. Anyone who played this game for atleast 3-4 years knows perfectly that spring GL is a water map and that water is key to control the map, on top of booming.
Just because you ignore those things doesn't mean what I say is wrong or anything. You only admit you're wrong when you are exposed to the crude truth after claiming something and disregarding other opinions like you just did here. You should just accept that it is impossible for anyone to know the game perfectly so you cannot make claims like you do.
Now, back to the fuckin topic. Ruyter spam is a thing. There is no fuckin doubt about that. And yes, I saw people complaining about it already, which leads me to say that it can be considered as lame as laming goons, which is, again, something that I heard people complaining about.
Re: ruyters are lame
but goon spam is not lame?
- [Armag] diarouga
- Ninja
- Posts: 12710
- Joined: Feb 26, 2015
- ESO: diarouga
- Location: France
Re: ruyters are lame
Garja wrote:That's simply not true. I could tell you just go watch the last 10k TAD games that you find between AS and the JP sitea nd you'll find like 100 instances of people sending schooners on GL.
There isn't even an argument here. Anyone who played this game for atleast 3-4 years knows perfectly that spring GL is a water map and that water is key to control the map, on top of booming.
Just because you ignore those things doesn't mean what I say is wrong or anything. You only admit you're wrong when you are exposed to the crude truth after claiming something and disregarding other opinions like you just did here. You should just accept that it is impossible for anyone to know the game perfectly so you cannot make claims like you do.
Now, back to the fuckin topic. Ruyter spam is a thing. There is no fuckin doubt about that. And yes, I saw people complaining about it already, which leads me to say that it can be considered as lame as laming goons, which is, again, something that I heard people complaining about.
Water is a key on gl, I totally agree but sending schooners is a waste.
1st you want to control the tps so atp>schooners
2nd no whales so you can t really boom, you can only make like 10 boats so you spend a shipment+600w to get 10unupgraded boats=>not worth at all.
Lol, I admit I'm wrong when I think I am wrong, not when people think I am wrong.
It s also funny to hear that from a guy who keeps saying that russia is tier 1 btw and that they beat fre, ger, sioux and can beat azzy on RE maps.
Re: ruyters are lame
If anything on GL you want the TPs to send your naval shipments, water booming itself is meh compared to rushing frigates etc. Stagecoach on wood is great for warship production.
Ruyter (and goon for that matter) mass is pretty lame. IMO they need to go the zamb route with less atk-higher multipliers.
Ruyter (and goon for that matter) mass is pretty lame. IMO they need to go the zamb route with less atk-higher multipliers.
Re: ruyters are lame
How do ruyters even compare to goons stat/cost wise? I always feel they are relatively shitty.
-
- Pro Player
- Posts: 10282
- Joined: Jun 6, 2015
- Location: Paris
- GameRanger ID: 5529322
Re: ruyters are lame
Hazza54321 wrote:Ruyters are so lame can we please nerf them, also can we buff uhlans, theyre too weak
So easy to quote without context. I said that 150 ruyts spam in team games on ep is lame. Can you deny that ? Everybody knows dutch is top civ on ep in team, and goon spam overall is broken in team games. So... ?
LoOk_tOm wrote:I have something in particular against Kaisar (GERMANY NOOB mercenary LAMME FOREVER) And the other people (noobs) like suck kaiser ... just this ..
- Gichtenlord
- Howdah
- Posts: 1437
- Joined: Nov 15, 2015
Re: ruyters are lame
hunter wrote:Jerom wrote:Show hidden quotes
Whats so funny about this? Hes a top32 player, possibly even better, judging from tournaments.
Forgive my bluntness but to put it straight garja is a self obsessed human being who thinks he is top 3 at this which gets only more ridiculed by the hype and status of so called god people like you give to him. He is good but that's it maybe top 50 atm top 10 on his best day probably but that's it. Considering all time of aoe 3 the list is so long that by the garja number pops up most would have torn the paper into pieces
The hate is real
r]
- Method_man714
- Lancer
- Posts: 586
- Joined: Mar 12, 2015
- ESO: Therotivator
Re: ruyters are lame
Jerom wrote:How do ruyters even compare to goons stat/cost wise? I always feel they are relatively shitty.
ruiters were lame back in the day of OP dutch, nowadays i'm sure it's still lame if you can get away with it. they're just so damn cheap lol
goon spam is also lame, from what the team players say
Re: ruyters are lame
Ruyters have slightly better statistics per cost than Dragoons and take only one population each, but take nearly 30% more ranged damage than Dragoons due to the lower resistance.
I still think Ruyters should have slightly more speed than all light cavalry except camels by design...
I still think Ruyters should have slightly more speed than all light cavalry except camels by design...
Re: ruyters are lame
zoom wrote:Ruyters have slightly better statistics per cost than Dragoons and take only one population each, but take nearly 30% more ranged damage than Dragoons due to the lower resistance.
I still think Ruyters should have slightly more speed than all light cavalry except camels by design...
taking dutch or normal vs for coin?
I'd personally prefer goons for sure. Much better training time per cost :p
Re: ruyters are lame
I'm so glad I clicked on this thread...
Re: ruyters are lame
deleted_user wrote:lol the egos
Let's see some more self degradation please. I, for one, suck.
Apparently u're still the only one here who sucks
-
- Ninja
- Posts: 14364
- Joined: Mar 26, 2015
Re: ruyters are lame
Hmmm I need someone to argue with about who sucks more to keep in the spirit of things.
Re: ruyters are lame
deleted_user wrote:lol the egos
Let's see some more self degradation please. I, for one, suck.
I suck your ass from a straw. Good luck trumping that!deleted_user wrote:Hmmm I need someone to argue with about who sucks more to keep in the spirit of things.
Re: ruyters are lame
[Armag] diarouga wrote:Well, «whales don't matter in water games»
«Russia is tier 1»
«rams are good»
«I would send schooners on GL»
Just stop lol
"Whales aren't a factor in half the games that are played on maps featuring them."
"Russians are a tier one civilization (out of two or three tiers in total) on non-TP maps."
"Rams are good at sieging."
"I would sometimes send Schooners on GL."
I think that is a more fair paraphrasing of what Garja said. What's more, to my understanding King-Ragu himself was banned for yet another infraction of site rules after multiple warnings in a short period of time. I very much doubt it's permanent as well...
Re: ruyters are lame
deleted_user wrote:Hmmm I need someone to argue with about who sucks more to keep in the spirit of things.
But I thought sir collen was pretty gud?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests