lol
New Civ-Tierlist?
-
- ESOC Pro Team
- Posts: 1116
- Joined: Jan 25, 2019
- Location: Wales (new, south)
Re: New Civ-Tierlist?
china brooken
- [Armag] diarouga
- Ninja
- Posts: 12710
- Joined: Feb 26, 2015
- ESO: diarouga
- Location: France
Re: New Civ-Tierlist?
1. How is China the best civ? It loses a lot of MUs : Germany, Iroquois, brit, Sioux and maybe even Russia and India (not sure though). China in tier A would make sense but it's just not S tier.
2. I'm not sure how Russia and Otto are tier C when Port and France are tier B.
2. I'm not sure how Russia and Otto are tier C when Port and France are tier B.
Re: New Civ-Tierlist?
[Armag] diarouga wrote:1. How is China the best civ? It loses a lot of MUs : Germany, Iroquois, brit, Sioux and maybe even Russia and India (not sure though). China in tier A would make sense but it's just not S tier.
2. I'm not sure how Russia and Otto are tier C when Port and France are tier B.
China wins/can win all MUs. Vs Germans is close, vs Iro mostly depends on the crate start so, simplifying, china has 2/3 chances to win. Brit is relatively easy MU. Sioux is not easy, kinda like Germans. Russia is not a problematic MU with semi FF builds. India loses to China imo.
-
- Pro Player
- Posts: 8050
- Joined: May 4, 2015
- ESO: PrinceofBabu
Re: New Civ-Tierlist?
Idk feels like you can counter pick france with german dutch russia china
-
- Pro Player
- Posts: 8050
- Joined: May 4, 2015
- ESO: PrinceofBabu
Re: New Civ-Tierlist?
Move port to c and i agree with hazzas, maybe sioux debatable
Re: New Civ-Tierlist?
Hazza54321 wrote:This would be mine
sure about ports? if you count water maps too? or is this only for land maps?
If you see any mistakes in my grammar/vocabulary or whatever, please correct me. I really appreciate it
-
- Advanced Player
- Posts: 768
- Joined: Aug 7, 2016
- ESO: miggo1999
- Location: Hannover
Re: New Civ-Tierlist?
Can you guys stop trolling with those tier-lists pls? This is the objective tier-list.
- Attachments
-
- [Armag] diarouga
- Ninja
- Posts: 12710
- Joined: Feb 26, 2015
- ESO: diarouga
- Location: France
Re: New Civ-Tierlist?
Garja wrote:[Armag] diarouga wrote:1. How is China the best civ? It loses a lot of MUs : Germany, Iroquois, brit, Sioux and maybe even Russia and India (not sure though). China in tier A would make sense but it's just not S tier.
2. I'm not sure how Russia and Otto are tier C when Port and France are tier B.
China wins/can win all MUs. Vs Germans is close, vs Iro mostly depends on the crate start so, simplifying, china has 2/3 chances to win. Brit is relatively easy MU. Sioux is not easy, kinda like Germans. Russia is not a problematic MU with semi FF builds. India loses to China imo.
Brit is easy? How?
Re: New Civ-Tierlist?
How is not easy.
Vs colonial, you just apply textbook defense and FF wins easy. Vs any sort of Brit FF China FF is better. Probably even FI is viable vs Brit aging.
Vs colonial, you just apply textbook defense and FF wins easy. Vs any sort of Brit FF China FF is better. Probably even FI is viable vs Brit aging.
-
- Advanced Player
- Posts: 768
- Joined: Aug 7, 2016
- ESO: miggo1999
- Location: Hannover
- [Armag] diarouga
- Ninja
- Posts: 12710
- Joined: Feb 26, 2015
- ESO: diarouga
- Location: France
Re: New Civ-Tierlist?
Garja wrote:How is not easy.
Vs colonial, you just apply textbook defense and FF wins easy. Vs any sort of Brit FF China FF is better. Probably even FI is viable vs Brit aging.
Brit ff is better than China ff, not even close. Also colonial play is very hard to beat, although it's not as impossible as VC ff.
Re: New Civ-Tierlist?
Ive never lost as china vs brits except to a single well executed grenade rush.
Its a very difficult matchup for brits since they can boom all they want but the China mass is always bigger and more powerful. Brits has to upgrade ALL their units except goons, china gets 4 shadowtech units (5 if you include hand mortars, 6 if you include redcoats) which mass quickly and hard counter anything brits can make. In what world is a brit ff superior to china??
Its a very difficult matchup for brits since they can boom all they want but the China mass is always bigger and more powerful. Brits has to upgrade ALL their units except goons, china gets 4 shadowtech units (5 if you include hand mortars, 6 if you include redcoats) which mass quickly and hard counter anything brits can make. In what world is a brit ff superior to china??
- [Armag] diarouga
- Ninja
- Posts: 12710
- Joined: Feb 26, 2015
- ESO: diarouga
- Location: France
Re: New Civ-Tierlist?
dansil92 wrote:Ive never lost as china vs brits except to a single well executed grenade rush.
Its a very difficult matchup for brits since they can boom all they want but the China mass is always bigger and more powerful. Brits has to upgrade ALL their units except goons, china gets 4 shadowtech units (5 if you include hand mortars, 6 if you include redcoats) which mass quickly and hard counter anything brits can make. In what world is a brit ff superior to china??
Brit ff is superior to China ff, not close as I said. I don't remember losing even once to a China ff doing a brit ff, and I think I've played all the strong chinese players, the only games I lost were against colonial stuffs or FI because I scouted too late and got cheesed.
-
- Lancer
- Posts: 506
- Joined: Jul 11, 2019
- ESO: Peachrocks
Re: New Civ-Tierlist?
Basically agree with Diarougas. Tried quoting, doesn't work.
I'd personally move Japan and Port up one but I've always hated Japan's design and feel it should burn in a fire, so I'm prejudiced .
I'd personally move Japan and Port up one but I've always hated Japan's design and feel it should burn in a fire, so I'm prejudiced .
- [Armag] diarouga
- Ninja
- Posts: 12710
- Joined: Feb 26, 2015
- ESO: diarouga
- Location: France
Re: New Civ-Tierlist?
Probably something like that on no TP maps.
Although China might be tier B and Germany tier C.
Although China might be tier B and Germany tier C.
Re: New Civ-Tierlist?
Garja wrote:How is not easy.
Vs colonial, you just apply textbook defense and FF wins easy. Vs any sort of Brit FF China FF is better. Probably even FI is viable vs Brit aging.
Brit just gets so much more stuff in colo or even fortress with superior eco.
-
- Pro Player
- Posts: 8050
- Joined: May 4, 2015
- ESO: PrinceofBabu
Re: New Civ-Tierlist?
I think ger are better than sioux spain and iro on non tp
Re: New Civ-Tierlist?
I'd go as far as saying Brit is the counter to China. Really, I'd prefer any other MU over Brits if I'm China for the reasons Dia and Lukas already listed. It's similarly hard to beat India, but Brit is just easier to execute to beat China I feel (Maining both civs)
Re: New Civ-Tierlist?
I think the balance is better than most people make it out to be.
Though ofc it's hard to make a general list when maps play such an important role.
Though ofc it's hard to make a general list when maps play such an important role.
Re: New Civ-Tierlist?
Lukas_L99 wrote:Garja wrote:How is not easy.
Vs colonial, you just apply textbook defense and FF wins easy. Vs any sort of Brit FF China FF is better. Probably even FI is viable vs Brit aging.
Brit just gets so much more stuff in colo or even fortress with superior eco.
Diesnt really matter as China units are just more effective and st some point Brit loaes tons of income by walkong vills to farther resources. I remember a game you played against Soldier on Hudson Bay and that you lost iirc. You got outmassed by colo Brit but could still ein st several points just because of the tech difference. Also Brit is one of those civs against which going full iron troop from monastery works extremely well I think.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests