[Armag] diarouga wrote:I'm quite sure that you said that India was the top civ in 1v1. Hazza, tabben and erik also did.
Not entirely true, though I definitely place India above average. But i also think some people have been drastically overrating them (like Prince, Hazza, Lukas). [spoiler=spoiler][/spoiler] Like a few months ago Prince was ranting in the India thread about how "blatantly OP" the civ is, claiming that it hadn't lost a single non-mirror in elimination brackets thus far (which was blatantly false).
And Garja was claiming that India FI is "pretty much viable in every MU atm" which just seems like a completely random statement without much support.
Though i do believe you underrated their strength a bit in some matchups (vs brits, aztecs for example) when you returned.
Could you mention players who lost as india to other civs where the players were even remotely close in skill? Garja snowww ain't gonna cut it... sorry G
Dongtay vs me.
We're close in skill because he's winning our series 3-1.
lol ur terrible. Iv beaten dongtay 5+ times on 1v1 and none of them have been close. I bash him so ez he always accuses me of cheating at the end.
This was such an ez bait to grudge match you. I knew you'd reply in kind, I'm just way ahead of your IQ, kid.
[Armag] diarouga wrote:I'm quite sure that you said that India was the top civ in 1v1. Hazza, tabben and erik also did.
Not entirely true, though I definitely place India above average. But i also think some people have been drastically overrating them (like Prince, Hazza, Lukas). [spoiler=spoiler][/spoiler] Like a few months ago Prince was ranting in the India thread about how "blatantly OP" the civ is, claiming that it hadn't lost a single non-mirror in elimination brackets thus far (which was blatantly false).
And Garja was claiming that India FI is "pretty much viable in every MU atm" which just seems like a completely random statement without much support.
Though i do believe you underrated their strength a bit in some matchups (vs brits, aztecs for example) when you returned.
Could you mention players who lost as india to other civs where the players were even remotely close in skill? Garja snowww ain't gonna cut it... sorry G
Dongtay vs me.
We're close in skill because he's winning our series 3-1.
lol ur terrible. Iv beaten dongtay 5+ times on 1v1 and none of them have been close. I bash him so ez he always accuses me of cheating at the end.
This was such an ez bait to grudge match you. I knew you'd reply in kind, I'm just way ahead of your IQ, kid.
People who call others “kid” just fucking annoy me.
[Armag] diarouga wrote:I'm quite sure that you said that India was the top civ in 1v1. Hazza, tabben and erik also did.
Not entirely true, though I definitely place India above average. But i also think some people have been drastically overrating them (like Prince, Hazza, Lukas). [spoiler=spoiler][/spoiler] Like a few months ago Prince was ranting in the India thread about how "blatantly OP" the civ is, claiming that it hadn't lost a single non-mirror in elimination brackets thus far (which was blatantly false).
And Garja was claiming that India FI is "pretty much viable in every MU atm" which just seems like a completely random statement without much support.
Though i do believe you underrated their strength a bit in some matchups (vs brits, aztecs for example) when you returned.
Could you mention players who lost as india to other civs where the players were even remotely close in skill? Garja snowww ain't gonna cut it... sorry G
Dongtay vs me.
We're close in skill because he's winning our series 3-1.
lol ur terrible. Iv beaten dongtay 5+ times on 1v1 and none of them have been close. I bash him so ez he always accuses me of cheating at the end.
This was such an ez bait to grudge match you. I knew you'd reply in kind, I'm just way ahead of your IQ, kid.
Lol as if I'd waste my time with a troll like you. Pay me 25 dollars and I'll consider it.
[Armag] diarouga wrote:I'm quite sure that you said that India was the top civ in 1v1. Hazza, tabben and erik also did.
Not entirely true, though I definitely place India above average. But i also think some people have been drastically overrating them (like Prince, Hazza, Lukas). [spoiler=spoiler][/spoiler] Like a few months ago Prince was ranting in the India thread about how "blatantly OP" the civ is, claiming that it hadn't lost a single non-mirror in elimination brackets thus far (which was blatantly false).
And Garja was claiming that India FI is "pretty much viable in every MU atm" which just seems like a completely random statement without much support.
Though i do believe you underrated their strength a bit in some matchups (vs brits, aztecs for example) when you returned.
Could you mention players who lost as india to other civs where the players were even remotely close in skill? Garja snowww ain't gonna cut it... sorry G
Dongtay vs me.
We're close in skill because he's winning our series 3-1.
lol ur terrible. Iv beaten dongtay 5+ times on 1v1 and none of them have been close. I bash him so ez he always accuses me of cheating at the end.
This was such an ez bait to grudge match you. I knew you'd reply in kind, I'm just way ahead of your IQ, kid.
People who call others “kid” just fucking annoy me.
well?
Hippocrits are the worst of animals. I love elifants.
[Armag] diarouga wrote:I'm quite sure that you said that India was the top civ in 1v1. Hazza, tabben and erik also did.
Not entirely true, though I definitely place India above average. But i also think some people have been drastically overrating them (like Prince, Hazza, Lukas). [spoiler=spoiler][/spoiler] Like a few months ago Prince was ranting in the India thread about how "blatantly OP" the civ is, claiming that it hadn't lost a single non-mirror in elimination brackets thus far (which was blatantly false).
And Garja was claiming that India FI is "pretty much viable in every MU atm" which just seems like a completely random statement without much support.
Though i do believe you underrated their strength a bit in some matchups (vs brits, aztecs for example) when you returned.
Could you mention players who lost as india to other civs where the players were even remotely close in skill? Garja snowww ain't gonna cut it... sorry G
Dongtay vs me.
We're close in skill because he's winning our series 3-1.
lol ur terrible. Iv beaten dongtay 5+ times on 1v1 and none of them have been close. I bash him so ez he always accuses me of cheating at the end.
This was such an ez bait to grudge match you. I knew you'd reply in kind, I'm just way ahead of your IQ, kid.
People who call others “kid” just fucking annoy me.
iwillspankyou wrote:I dont know if "kid" are annoying to you, but for me it means that you are not grown up, and have not formed your own opinions yet. Like you?
I sincerely cannot imagine why you would think I get any political opinions from my dad
iwillspankyou wrote:I dont know if "kid" are annoying to you, but for me it means that you are not grown up, and have not formed your own opinions yet. Like you?
I sincerely cannot imagine why you would think I get any political opinions from my dad
I do not know, but I usually think you post conclutions, without any arguments to how you got there?
Hippocrits are the worst of animals. I love elifants.
[Armag] diarouga wrote:I'm quite sure that you said that India was the top civ in 1v1. Hazza, tabben and erik also did.
Not entirely true, though I definitely place India above average. But i also think some people have been drastically overrating them (like Prince, Hazza, Lukas). [spoiler=spoiler][/spoiler] Like a few months ago Prince was ranting in the India thread about how "blatantly OP" the civ is, claiming that it hadn't lost a single non-mirror in elimination brackets thus far (which was blatantly false).
And Garja was claiming that India FI is "pretty much viable in every MU atm" which just seems like a completely random statement without much support.
Though i do believe you underrated their strength a bit in some matchups (vs brits, aztecs for example) when you returned.
Could you mention players who lost as india to other civs where the players were even remotely close in skill? Garja snowww ain't gonna cut it... sorry G
Dongtay vs me.
We're close in skill because he's winning our series 3-1.
lol ur terrible. Iv beaten dongtay 5+ times on 1v1 and none of them have been close. I bash him so ez he always accuses me of cheating at the end.
This was such an ez bait to grudge match you. I knew you'd reply in kind, I'm just way ahead of your IQ, kid.
Lol as if I'd waste my time with a troll like you. Pay me 25 dollars and I'll consider it.
I knew you'd dodge.
All it takes to beat you is two groups of two uhlans.
[Armag] diarouga wrote:Usually the toxic guys are good at the game, Callen is the exception.
No, loads of people (in QS or 3v3 deccan etc.) are toxic but still shite at the game. If anything it's the other way around, good players are usually toxic. (With some exceptions of course)
I can understand them, investing so much time to the point this game is becoming their second life and still losing to someone who doesn't put nearly as much effort... it must be devastating for their ego.
deleted_user 
[/spoiler]
spanky4ever 
Sargsyan 
[Armag] diarouga 
princeofkabul 
