thebritish wrote:guys, please stop with the flame
Please stop writing
evilcheadar wrote:Do you not get what an opinion is? You try to counter me by saying well it can't be BAD because it's GOOD. What an inane post. I've also explained why I think cavalry archers are bad back in my thread so indeed I actually CAN defend my position. Get educated in basic reasoning please, because this is just pathetic. Once again you distort reality by stating that I said you shouldn't ever send in food crates.
Haha but what you say is just false... Just try in editor mode, cav archers do better than goons :
- against other ranged cav (they beat all euro ranged cavs)
- against ranged inf (they're better vs musks and skirms)
- against heavy cav and hand inf without kiting
- against falcs
So basically, the only better things about goons is they're faster and shoot more quickly. Which means :
- you can kite heavy cav endlessly with a good micro
- it's easier to kite hand inf
But :
- CA don't need to kite heavy cav since they tank so hard melee attacks (almost twice more melee hp than goons, cost effectively wise). 1 CA > 1 huss
- CA can still kite heavy inf because they're faster. They will only struggle against rods, and even vs those with a good micro you can kite.
So when are goons really better than CA, tell me ? Oh and btw, if you aim at beginners, why do you want them to make goons ? You have to micro to make goons efficient. If you don't hit and run, cav > goons lol. Try it. While CA > cav, with or without micro...
P.S : I fart on your face