deleted_user wrote:What does this even mean. I am fine with umeu playing whoever he wishes to play on his own accord.
You missed the internal memo. All multiplayer matches are now controlled by the media team and will be ruled over by an iron fist. We hope for a swift transition.
_H2O wrote:Because you shouldn't get increased advantage (e.g. More civ options / less diversity needed) because you are losing in a series.
no, that is correct. But you should also not make the same civ rules for a bo5 series as a bo3 series in a format that clearly doesn't support this. The rules for a bo3 should have been less restrictive to begin with.
_H2O wrote:Because you shouldn't get increased advantage (e.g. More civ options / less diversity needed) because you are losing in a series.
no, that is correct. But you should also not make the same civ rules for a bo5 series as a bo3 series in a format that clearly doesn't support this. The rules for a bo3 should have been less restrictive to begin with.
How would you do it? I think having only one round that is BO3 is addressing that.
LoOk_tOm wrote:I have something in particular against Kaisar (GERMANY NOOB mercenary LAMME FOREVER) And the other people (noobs) like suck kaiser ... just this ..